Tuesday, 29 November 2011

Scientific breakthrough?



Faeces burgers? Seriously?
It never ceases to amaze me exactly how far scientists will go, in the attempt to play God.  Although, perhaps in this case, the more appropriate title would be: 'God of the bog'.  


Mitsuyuki Ikeda, the Japanese scientist behind such lunacy, claims that the burger - made from human excrement, steak flavouring, soy sauce and food colouring - tastes just like beef.  This sickening product, is supposedly set out to be the next big vegetarian meat alternative.  I ask, who would actually want to eat human waste?

Mitsuyuki Ikeda, believes his product will become popular with people wishing to lose/keep their weight down.  Is anyone actually that foolish/desperate?  Sadly, yes!

The human waste is high in protein matter.  This protein matter is extracted from the poo and basically tampered with (adding god knows what chemicals and such) until it can be made to resemble a meat product.  But why not save yourself some pennies?  Mould your own leavings in to a burger.  As the bought in alternative is set to be expensive.  Doesn't this veggie burger sound appetising?!

Will the FDA approve this?  More than likely.  The FDA's approval of anything is highly questionable.  For more info on this sick subject please visit this link: http://www.naturalnews.com/032715_turd_steaks_human_waste.html

Saturday, 26 November 2011

2012 Olympics: The future attack on London and Big Ben:


In 2012 the completely broke and in recession country England is hosting the Olympics in London.  Aside from this being a plot to further pull on the financial chains that bind the English, many theorists also believe this to be a deliberate set up for an inside job fake terrorist attack on London, specifically Big Ben, perhaps parliament and the actual Olympics.  Many things point to this being a strong possibility.  For example, the film V for Vendetta shows Big Ben being blown up.  The second Cars film poster shows a plane flying towards Big Ben.  Remember how 9/11 was exposed in cartoons, films and CD imagery before it happened?!  This is the exact same thing.

In 2000, the Rug Rats movie showed a plane flying towards the twin towers.  The plane was heading for France, so the twin towers in the scene makes no sense.  Unless it was for that purpose.
On September 21, 1997 the Simpson's aired the episode the city of New York VS Homer Simpson - in which 9/11 is also predicted.  And the Pentagon is also mentioned on the train by the homeless crazy man who refers to himself as Jesus.  Here is the Simpson's clip:  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FBp6OPlrl1g&feature=related

Michael Jackson predicted 9/11 on his album cover blood on the dance floor, released four years before 9/11.   The film Terminator 2 1991 also predicts 9/11.  During the film when the vehicle is approaching a tunnel separated with wall in the middle - it says on the bridge 'caution 9 - 11.
Super Marios Bros 1993 - shows the Twin towers ablaze and beginning to collapse.
Godzilla 1998 - mentions the WTC bombing.  And when a man looks at his watch the time is set to 8:55 in other words, 9/11 is depicted by the hands.
Trading places 1983 shows the twin towers - and a clock with the time 8:55 - with 9/11 being depicted by the hands again.
These are just some of the examples.  It isn't the first time a planned tragic event has been portrayed in the entertainment industry.  And this is why I believe the predictions for the Olympics to be accurate.


In 1995, Steve Jackson games released an Illuminati card game - many of the disaster cards have already happened.  And here is the one for the Olympics:

Big Ben is shown as collapsing on the people.  And the people in the foreground of the image are wearing the colours of the Olympics.  

Let us view some of the other disasters predicted in this fascinating card game that seems to have almost vanished, coincidentally of course.


9/11 - The twin towers and the pentagon attacks are shown here.


Kill for peace.  The American war against Iraq, Libya and Afghanistan were supposedly for peace and freedom.


America and England are police states. 


History has been rewritten many times.  To cover up the truth so that the Zionist Jews can prevail.  From the Jewish slave trade, to Hitler and the 6 million Jewish death toll lie, history has been rewritten.


The gulf oil spill that is currently destroying the sea.  Which nobody has been prosecuted for.  This is destroying livelihoods and killing anything that needs the sea to survive.  And the people responsible have been given new drilling licenses.  It has all been covered up, as if it never happened.


Here is one that is happening now.  America and England armies are being sent to provoke strong countries with attacks.  This will cause world war three.  America is on the verge or is already attacking Russia, a country that will retaliate.  Many lives will be lost - and all because of the media and establishment lies to justify war.


This is what their overall goal is.  To greatly reudce the population.  They will leave a few alive to keep as slaves.  But not enough to be a risk to them.


Japan is now radioactive due to the Israeli Stuxnet virus which knocked out the security systems - which should have prevented a melt down. 


In 2004, the Tsunami disaster killed many.  Indonesia suffered the greatest, followed by Sri Lanka, India and Thailand.  Do not forget that the US/establishment/Zionists have technology that controls and manipulates the weather.


Necrotizing fasciitis - is a flesh eating virus.  As is Ebola.  The Ebola one is man made, it may have been invented by the CIA or even the British.



Now that you have an idea of the predictions, hopefully you will be willing to further research these things for yourself.



On the 21st of May, 2011, the Daily Mail wrote an article stating that Al Qaeda were threatening to avenge the death of Osama Bin Laden (former CIA agent).  The reason for this is to convince us that terrorists are plotting against us, just like 9/11 and 7/7 - except just like the future attacks on London, Big Ben and the Olympics, 9/11 and 7/7 were inside jobs.  For proof that the official 9/11 story is not completely true, please view my video 9/11 truth which is posted on this blog in another article.  Also my article entitled BBC 9/11 lies.

As you saw in the image of the combined attacks card, Big Ben is a future target.  And what better a time to attack than the 2012 Olympics in front of so many witnesses - that will become so afraid of terrorism - that they will not question the official story.  And may even begin to wonder about 9/11 and 7/7.  Plus, what better way to kill off thousands of innocent people?!

Do yourself a favour, stay away from London in 2012.  Pass this information on.  And remember this warning come the dreadful future attack.

Friday, 25 November 2011

England is in recession, so let's spend £250000 on the Olympics:

 
Youtube has some interesting theories on why we are having the Olympics, here is one I viewed myself and I believe there to be some truth in it:  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qqwj4tIH2ds&feature=related

Also, so many public facilities are being taken away to cut costs for the Olympics.  We will not benefit at all from the Olympics.  But we will most definitely suffer from our facilities being taken away.  What are our taxes for exactly?!  Well, in reality they're to line the pockets of the greedy establishment.  And to pay for things we don't want, need or in any way benefit from.  Of course officially tax is to benefit the community and it is our duty to pay through the nose so that the government can wear their tailor made designer suits, dine at expensive restaurants and basically live the high life while we try to make ends meet.  Worrying where the next meal is coming from, and how to make a small amount of money cover bills and food costs.  Oh how the greedy establishment suffer for their people?!

Thursday, 24 November 2011

Crime doesn't pay... Or does it?!




From what we have rammed down our throats, starting from a very early age. One would believe, that the legal system, is there to help people who fall victims to evil criminals. Once upon a time, this was true. In the days when justice, was actually served. Today, the law protects the criminals from being justly punished, for their evil crimes. Most crimes don't even reach the news papers these days, unless they are racist crimes, (mostly, crimes commited by whites against other races), crimes against the government, some stronger or milder crimes reach the newspaper. But when it comes to other races persecuting whites, it is rarely even mentioned (mostly being displayed in a small paragrapth, somewhere barely noticeable). And so people are lead to believe, that racism AGAINST whites, never happens.  This of course, is deliberate. Because, it allows political correctness and the liberal agenda, to easily be enforced.

If the newspapers were to tell the truth about dealers, or drug related crimes etc, people would be outraged. Even more so if they knew that the criminals, are in no way punished. Instead, they're treated as victims themselves. With no consideration, for the actual victims of these criminals. England is a highly developed police state. With CCTV monitoring pretty much everywhere (these days). A network of paid informers, provide a constant flow of information. In addition to CCTV in towns, all the major roads networks are covered by CCTV, with number plate recognition technology. There are also military listening posts, which monitor every text message, email, telephone conversation and Internet activity, in which originates, or ends in this country. With this mass of information, the police are aware of every business transaction committed by criminals, such as drug dealers, people traffickers, paedophiles and pimps.  Why then, is there such a slow (if any) response to these crimes?

The opium fields were taken control of by the state. When America and Britain invaded Afghanistan in 2002, these fields had previously been burnt down by the Taliban. But since the troops moved in on this area, the crops have been regrown. Surprise, surprise, the heroin market has never been more busy, or free flowing. And since this is an Asian drug found only in Afghanistan, it is quite obvious that only Asians and the military, would have access to these drugs. Thus narrowing the heroin drug dealers down slightly. But if the troops control these fields shouldn't it be rather difficult to smuggle this drug? Strangely it seems not. Of course the only conclusion that can be drawn from this, is that the state are the true drug dealers. Using the foolish Asian dealers to smuggle. And selling it to the even more foolish addicts for a profit. But why would the state want to allow such an evil, dirty, drug to be so obtainable? Perhaps because, "Heroin leaves the person taking it in a state - where they are blissfully unaware of anything that matters. Unable to think rationally. Unattached from any real human emotions. It makes the addict feel safe. Like they are surrounded by cotton wool. Nothing can touch them."  As it leaves the addict experiencing no feelings of emotion, they are more likely to be dangerous to those they steal from, in order to get their next fix.  This drug leaves them with no common decency. Which means, when most of them steal to pay for their drugs, they will be fine with mugging, burgling, shoplifting, shamelessly victimising innocent people. They will heartlessly steal from young children, even if it is as little as £1. They will break in to your house, if you are unfortunate enough to be home, they will attack you, then rob you. Some heroin addicts, pay for their habit by selling their bodies to the dealers. As well as the dealers friends. Some, even build up a network of customers outside the drug circle. Grievously, it is not unusual, for some of these girls selling their bodies, to not even have reached double figures in age.

Heroin, keeps people from being a threat to the system. It keeps addicts from thinking about anything, except naturally, their next hit. Much the same as alcohol, keeps those sticking to the law from thinking much at all. It lowers the brain activity. Thus closing the mind off. Leaving the drinker in a state where they can barely think at all. It is not good for the body in any way. In fact, it is more dangerous than natural hallucinogenics. (Which taken properly, can be very beneficial both mentally and physically). Yet it is still legal to drink very dangerous alcohol. While, natural hallucinogenics such as, mushrooms, or cannabis are illegal. Even though they are good for you when used correctly. And open up the mind to new experiences and knowledge. Cannibis, has already proved to have healing benefits for patients of severe illnesses, or injuries.

Criminals, tested and found guilty of having heroin in their system, are given drugs orders on probation. Instead of going to prison, they have to go on a methadone prescription. These criminals are given drug tests, ranging between twice weekly, or once fortnightly. Everything that the addicts need (provided they have committed a crime), is payed for. Including housing, bills, food, drugs, clothes, shopping, furniture, electrical goods, days out, education, TVs etc. On top of all this, they still receive incapcity benefit/jobseekers allowance/income support. They are of course, free to do whatever they want.

Human rights exist not to help those who have had theirs violated. But to protect those who have violated the rights of others. When a drug addict commits a crime, they do not get punished... Unless it is a crime against the state - such as contempt in court. For example telling a judge that he is an out of touch moron. Which in most cases is the truth. Some of the sickest crimes to be committed these days, still receive no punishment. Evil crimes such as - paedophilia, rape, mugging, murder, assault and burglaries. These criminals are left free, to commit such crimes again. In many cases, these criminals are even moved in to areas with normal, law abiding citizens. Leaving innocent people to suffer from such crimes. Yet, I would imagine areas where the rich and powerful (such as the government) live you will find none! The rich live in walled communities. Which have CCTV surveillance, security guards, not to mention plenty of other expensive measures. (at the tax payers expense - of course), Which insures only the ever protected rich and powerful, have access to these properties.
And liberal morons ensure that criminals are spread across the country. Ruining the lives of the hard working decent English. This clearly excludes their own people, which are very carefully guarded.

People who make the law, protect people who break the law. Those who pay for the crimes of the state and the scum they create, are the ordinary people. Who get daily screwed by the rubbish in charge of the country. As well as the rubbish who would be in gaol, if there was any sanity in this country.
(By the way, for people who don't understand what the word gaol means, that is the English spelling of the word which Americans would call a penitentiary - or jail).

Wednesday, 23 November 2011

BBC 9/11 lies:

The BBC has always been a means of enforcing establishment propaganda, however they far exceeded their usual stupidity on the

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-14665953 
Gives the impression that conspiracy theories are totally paranoid and unfounded.  Making the whole idea of questioning any official story seem an act of insanity.  As well as unpatriotic.  But in reality to question things is normal.  To accept without question is the true act of insanity.  Questioning leads to answers and truth.  Mindlessly believing everything the media tells us is not normal behaviour.  But we have been conditioned to never think or question anything by the indoctrinating education system.  And anyone who believes it wrong to question and research such things as 9/11, if a complete and utter moron.

The BBC post questions regarding 9/11 inconsistencies, then the conspiracy perspective, followed by the propaganda of lie of coincidences.

Here is what the BBC say:


*The question: Why did the world's most powerful air force fail to intercept any of the four hijacked planes?
*Conspiracy theorists say: The then US Vice President Dick Cheney ordered the military to stand down and not to intercept the planes.
 
*Official reports say: This was a highly unusual multiple hijacking with violence on board, and where the transponder, which identifies the plane, was turned off or changed.
What is more, a routine military training exercise happened to be taking place that day at US air defence command.
Air traffic controller Colin Scoggins was in constant contact with the military and did not see any lack of response. There was confusion and a lack of communication between the civilian air traffic control (FAA) and the military.
The military's equipment was also outdated and designed to look out over the ocean to deal with a Cold War threat.

 As you can see the very first response to the question is a coincidental training exercise.  Which was actually deliberately taking place so that the planes could not be intercepted when they were being flown in to buildings.  The planes were flown with military precision, by remote control in to the buildings.  For alleged hijackers to control the flight path towards, and in to a building so easily, is completely illogical.

*The question: Why did the Twin Towers collapse so quickly, within their own footprint, after fires on a few floors that lasted only for an hour or two?
*Conspiracy theorists say: The Twin Towers were destroyed by controlled demolitions. Theories relate to the rapid collapse (about 10 seconds), the relatively short-lived fires (56 minutes in World Trade Center 2 or 102 minutes in World Trade Center 1), reports of the sounds of explosions shortly before the collapse, and the violent ejections that could be seen at some windows many floors below the collapse.

*Official reports say: An extensive inquiry by the National Institute of Standards and Technology concluded that the planes severed and damaged support columns and dislodged fire-proofing.

Around 10,000 gallons of jet fuel were spewed over many floors starting widespread fires. Temperatures of up to 1,000C caused the floors to sag and the perimeter columns to bend, causing the sounds of "explosions".

The massive weight of the floors dropped, creating a dynamic load far in excess of what the columns were designed for. Debris was forced out of the windows as the floors above collapsed.

Controlled demolition is nearly always carried out from the bottom floors up, yet this collapse started at the top.

No evidence has ever been found of explosive charges despite the extensive hand searches and there is no evidence of any pre-cutting of columns or walls, which is routinely carried out in a controlled demolition.

 Explosions were heard in the basement - which was blasted out before the collapse to make way for the controlled demolition.
The damage from the planes was not severe enough to cause a complete collapse.  Had there not been explosives, a few floors surrounding the hit may or may not have collapsed on to lower floors.  But the building would have remained standing.
Images show a woman standing at the edge of the building where the plane hit - had the damage been severe enough to cause several floors to collapse she would not have been able to stand there and look over the edge.  Plus, had the fires been so hot and fierce she would not have stood there - she would either be burning alive or making her escape from the flames.  This suggests the fire was dying out.
In regards to the jet fuel spillage - there is no way 10,000 gallons were spewed over many floors.  Most of the jet fuel was consumed in the fireball that resulted from the initial impact.  About two thirds of the jet fuel was burnt up in about ten minutes.  The fireball burnt outside of the building.
The steel frame needed a much hotter temperature than the fires from the plane hit to buckle or melt.  (As molten steel was found in the debris upto six weeks after the event - which is the result of thermite explosives).
Much of the debris was removed amd destroyed before a full investigation could even start.

*The question: How could an amateur pilot fly a commercial plane in a complicated manoeuvre and crash it into the headquarters of the world's most powerful military, 78 minutes after the first report of a possible hijack and leave no trace?
*Conspiracy theorists say: A commercial Boeing 757 did not hit the building but instead a missile, a small aircraft or an unmanned drone was used. But since evidence has increasingly shown that the American Airlines Flight 77 did hit the building, the emphasis has shifted to questioning the difficult approach manoeuvre. It is argued it was not under the control of al-Qaeda but the Pentagon itself.

*Official reports say: Airplane wreckage, including the black boxes, were recovered from the scene and they were catalogued by the FBI.

Although some early video did not show much wreckage, there is a good deal of video and still photography which shows plane wreckage and evidence of the flight path, such as broken lamp posts.

The remains of crew and passengers on the plane were found and positively identified by DNA. Witnesses also saw the plane strike the Pentagon. 

 Very little plane wreckage was recovered at all.  The hijacker supposedly flew round in a circle to hit the pentagon from the other side - which wasn't designed to withstand it.  And flew downwards towards the pentagon - pulling upwards to make a direct hit - making a tiny hole, but leaving no trace of the more indestructible parts of the plane such as the engines.  Pilots for 9/11 truth have even stated that such a difficult manoeuvre, for an amateur pilot, capable of flying only very small planes, is impossible.  Even for a skilled pilot it would be extremely difficult.  The pentagon was hit by something much smaller - that was also remote controlled.  And the FAKE debris was planted afterwards.  The supporting collumns of the pentagon where the plane supposedly hit and vanished in to thin air - were undamaged.  Windows surrounding the hole were still intact.  Had the official story been true the collumns would be damaged or knocked out of place and the windows would have been smashed by the plane nose, tail and initial impact.

*The question: Why was the crash site at Shanksville, Pennsylvania, so small and why was the aircraft debris not visible?
*Conspiracy theorists argue: United Airlines flight 93 was shot down by a missile and disintegrated in mid air, scattering the wreckage over a large area.
 
*Official reports say: There are clear photographs showing aircraft wreckage and the cockpit voice recorder, which showed there had been a passenger revolt and the hijackers had deliberately crashed the plane.

Initial theories that heavy debris was scattered many miles from the main crash site turned out to be false. In fact the wind had blown light debris such as paper and insulation just over a mile.

Another theory was based on a misquote from the local coroner, Wally Miller, who said he stopped being a coroner after about 20 minutes because there were no bodies. What he also said was that he quickly realised it was a plane crash and there would have to be a large funeral service for the many victims.

In addition, the military never gave orders to the air force to shoot the commercial airliner down. 

 The official story claims that there was a passanger revolt and the proof of this is on the salavaged flight recorder, however that information was never made public.  And the wreckage on the ground in no matched what would be expected, if the plane had indeed crashed.  This particular flight has more questions than answers.  

*The question: How could a skyscraper, which was not hit by a plane, collapse so quickly and symmetrically, when no other steel-framed skyscraper has collapsed because of fire?
*Conspiracy theorists say: The World Trade Center Building 7 was destroyed by a controlled demolition using both explosives and incendiaries.

Initially the focus was on the phrase "pull it" used by the owner, Larry Silverstein, in a TV interview. But in fact he was talking about pulling firefighters back. (Demolition experts do not use the term "pull it" as slang for setting off explosives.)

Now the focus has shifted to the speed of the collapse which reached near free fall for 2.25 seconds. It is argued only explosives could make it collapse so quickly and symmetrically.

Some scientists, who are sceptical of the official account, have examined four dust samples from Ground Zero and claim to have found thermitic material which reacts violently when heated up. They claim tonnes of thermite and conventional explosives were rigged inside, not just WTC7, but also the Twin Towers.
*Official reports say: A three-year investigation by the National Institute of Standards and Technology concluded that the building collapsed because of uncontrolled fires, started by the collapse of the nearby North Tower, and which burnt for seven hours.

The mains water feeding the emergency sprinkler system was severed. No evidence has ever been found of explosive charges and there are no recordings of a series of very loud explosions that would have been expected with controlled demolition.

Furthermore, there is an alternative explanation for the "thermitic material" the sceptical scientists found in the dust - it is just a type of primer paint. It's calculated 1,200,000 tonnes of building materials were pulverised at the World Trade Center and most minerals are present in the dust (not necessarily in a large quantity). More extensive sampling of the dust has not found any evidence of thermite or explosives, says a report from the US Geological Survey and another from RJ Lee

WTC building 7 was barely damaged, and only suffered small isolated fires.  It collapsed in the style of a controlled demolition - just like the twin towers did.  
The sentence 'pull it' by Larry Silverstein - was directed towards the building itself and not as the BBC suggests the firemen - because one would never refer to men as 'it'.  If it had been a case of pulling the firemen out of the building he would have said it directly as in 'pull them out'.  Larry Silversteins interview can also be seen on my video 9/11 truth.  And you can see for yourself that he was referring to the building.
'Pull it' is a building term for controlled demolition.
Explosives were heard and blasts can be seen in the collapse footage for the twin towers - building seven fell in the exact same style and fell quickly, with no damage to the surrounding buildings.  

The BBC repeatedly claim that conspiracy theorists shift their argument, however what actually happens is questioning the official claim of such coincidences.  When one part of an argument is covered up by the BBC lies, conspiracy theorists question another inconsistency regarding the same issue.  It is known as 'debate'.  Not argument shifting as the media would have you believe.
The BBC carefully choose their words, making sure that their readers react a certain way, in this case the readers response is to believe conspiracy theories as far fetched, and theorists as unable to make and stick to a valid point.  The media often lead their viewers/readers to a set conclusion - and not many people see through it.
Do not listen to the official lies, think for yourself.  Do some research.  Always question the lies of the media.

Tuesday, 22 November 2011

Education, destroying the nation!


The education system is not only a valid tool in the destruction/ control of young minds, the expression "give me the child until he is seven, and I will give you the man" - springs to mind (I will further explain this later), but it is also a means of psychologically beating down young impressionable minds. This is apparent in the way that white youngsters are taught they are vermin, basically having any sense of self worth and esteem diminished. Whites undergo the training that we are unable to express pride in white culture, for this is offensive, racist and wrong - in the eyes of the liberal do gooder establishment. This psychological beating children take, leaves feelings of guilt, worthlessness and little promise of a good life or great achievements (since whites are told they are vermin).

The saying I mentioned in the first paragraph - "give me the child until he is seven, and I will give you the man", basically means that young children can be brainwashed, more easily than children over the age of seven, at a young age children are influenced by their surroundings and education. After age seven, children develop their own minds and cannot be controlled, this is why the idea is to get children while they are young - so that the thoughts and opinions can be shaped for them, this opinion is the politically correct, do gooder, whites are scum and should be punished opinion.


Children can go to nursery from as little as three months old, which is long before they have had any real bonding time with the parents, or had any chance to develop their own personality, instead of the one the establishment pushes on them. Once a child goes to nursery, parents begin to lose the child, not only by way of the strong bond parent and child should have, but also on the level in which children follow their parents example and form their own personality through doing so. Nurseries are just training stations, preparing your child for the complete brainwashing they shall experience in schools. While I agree that children should be allowed to have fun, enjoy childhood and play etc, this does not mean they have to be treated like idiots - children's minds work somewhat like sponges, soaking up everything this is how children learn. If you treat children like idiots, they behave as such. In nurseries children finger paint, play with sand and water, dress up, play with toys and have maybe one story book read to them a day, they also have TV time (of course) - this does not appeal to a child's intellect at all. Children need mental stimulation, their minds need challenging.


Learning, is often passed off as boring, too much like hard work and something which can never be fun - this idea is drummed in to the generations by the establishment, who separate fun from learning. Learning, is fun - I admit it is of a different kind of amusement, but still fun nonetheless. Schools aim to keep the two separated, by keeping lessons dull, too controlled and requiring little individuality, self thought or general freedom. Schools also have breaks in which children are free to play in between lessons, again separating the two from each other. The method in which children are taught, plays a major role in how children respond to, or take in that education - if the lesson bears no true stimulation for the child, the child will fail to fully take in or remember the information. If teachers were to appeal to children's playful and excitable nature, the children would better take in any lesson. This of course, is not what the establishment want, the idea is for us to merely regurgitate the information we are given, never fully examining any given subject from both opposing views as well as the supporting views. We are never allowed to question what is classed as the only truth, because we may form our own opinions from such free thinking, this would destroy any grip the Zionist elite have over us.


Going back to the point I made earlier regarding psychological beatings, this affects children on many levels - any foreigners who witness this, begin to form the opinion of being superior to the white race, which is not true, whites also begin to feel the same. Whites fail education, because the education system fails them. Being told you are vermin on a daily basis, does nothing to inspire self improvement, only having your potential recognised as well as encouraged can inspire self improvement and want for further education. Because of this white generations are becoming self loathing, uneducated, liberal do gooders or racist.


Since some races choose to take advantage of the liberal do gooder ideology, that any race except whites deserves better treatment, can never be questioned/ criticised, deserves more rights and should be considered superior to the white race - whites become angry at, or submissive to this way of life. Equal opportunity only exists for those who are either perverse, mentally unstable or a different race - so for those of us who are straight, white, or haven't had a sex change - we will be considered less important and basically last in line for help, employment, health care, benefits, housing and mental health care. The system defies everything which is normal, teaching those who are different to think they are much better than us, and teaching those who have been beaten in to a submissive lifestyle that we should be ashamed of being normal - and these submissive people impose their brainwashed ideology on to others.


England, is becoming a very angry country. Whites are feeling let down by the system, which favours race or perversions over straight whites. People can feel something isn't quite right. Sometimes this inspires people to look in to these issues further, other times it leads to joining groups which promise things they do not intend to deliver, such as rights for whites, immigration control etc. These political parties, have only one true agenda, to get people together, focusing on one small problem, so they can never see past this problem - for example: the BNP, which is considered a racist group for obvious reasons (although they are now allowing foreigners in the group), but the true nature of such a group is merely to keep people focused on the issue of race - not the issue of who is behind the foreigners having more rights than us, I will not deny that these races take advantage of this because they do, I also will not deny that they play the race card to get their way, because they do. But the true problem, lies with the establishment, which is set up create this division of opinions - this allows the establishment to gain control through tricking people in to thinking there is a way out, a better option to turn to. Yet all of these parties are controlled by the establishment, and designed only to keep the people down, to keep us from ever progressing towards freedom, equality and a better world of freedom and peace. Groups like the BNP, sit around in pubs (for most of their meetings) drinking beer, talking nonsensical clap trap about what should be happening and never actually take any action, which of course is the whole point, to never get anywhere - it gives people a sense of false hope, so that we are not actually out there taking action for ourselves, because we are relying on a leader to dictate what happens next.


People fall in to the trap, thinking that the BNP will save them because they have been so let down by the education system that they are unable to think critically. The school system teaches people that everything is simple, there is right and there is wrong, and that everything has to be taken at face value, children who have their brains crippled by the mis-education system are more easily manipulated in to thinking that democracy really exists in this country, and that Nick Griffin gives a toss about them. If we had an education system, rather than an indoctrination system, then the Zionist liars of the tory, labour, liberal and BNP, and boneheads of the NF and SWP would be seen for the charlatans they are. But people support these shysters, and believe they crap they are fed by the TV. Why? Because their minds have been destroyed in the schools they attended as young children!

Monday, 21 November 2011

The destruction of innocent minds.

Subliminal messages although somewhat mistakenly overlooked, or even passed off as sheer lunacy or coincidence, are ever becoming more widely noticed. The meaning behind these messages is mostly realised by people who already had some understanding of why pop music videos are used. On a conscious level we might notice some of the obvious messages being sent out, mostly the observable sexual imagery. It takes a much closer look at and understanding of subliminal messages, in order to see what the whole message, or less obvious image is telling the mind on a subconscious level.

Music videos by the likes of lady GaGa and other modern pop stars, consist mostly of symbolism and subliminal messages. Rihanna, is also known to do music videos with such content, or course because she is black this protects the actual video from criticism, since small minded people will claim that the criticism is a race related thing - rather than what it actually is which is exposing the messages that we are only supposed to receive on a subconscious level. When we do receive these messages as they are intended, we behave the way these messages suggest. We are susceptible to such influences because our brain responds to words and images on many levels, what is not readily seen by our eyes our brains processes and stores, yet we are unaware of this even though it causes our thoughts to imitate what we have seen.

The song "Bad romance" by Lady"boy" GaGa, is absolutely full of hidden influences. I will begin by pointing out the hidden meanings in the video, then I will move on to the lyrics. The opening of this music video starts with twenty three people (including Lady GaGa), and a dog - in most if not all videos by lady GaGa there is at least one dog shown, representing Cerberus hound of hell. Of the twenty three people in the opening image, twelve are dressed in black, ten in white and Lady GaGa is in gold - white and black symbolise a chess board as found in the temples of freemasonry, the ceiling and floor of this image are square tiles which also represents a chess board. On the left of this image, there is a bath with two women inside it, one man sat on the tub with his legs inside and two men leaning on the bath one of women's legs is stretched across the man sat on the tubs lap this woman is sat behind another woman, this is a sexual image representing an orgy. The whole lay out of the image is exposing an orgy, with more men than women. In the middle of the picture, Lady GaGa is sat in a chair which is representing a throne, at both sides of the chair is a woman in the position of the masonic lion statues which are placed one opposite the other on buildings (which can be found on many masonic buildings, or Zionist owned business buildings), this represents sun worship.

Twelve seconds in to this video, Lady GaGa exposes mesh on her fingernails, which is symbolic of a web - which is used in the protocols in the Zionist capture of the planet.

In the very next image, the room is reminiscent of a prison cell (or at least what prison cells used to be like). The first noticeable thing in this scene of the video is the vodka bottles, underneath the neck of the bottle is an upside down pyramid which has four lines across it, one of them separating the cap stone from the pyramid. There is an eye shape inside the pyramid, representing the all seeing eye of the devil, and the word lex is written inside the eye - which is very similar to lux which means light coming from Sirius the dog star which is itself representative of Isis, Osiris and Horus which is the Illuminati trinity (the gods of our hidden rulers) an interesting choice of a bottle for such a video - it makes a bold statement of ownership by the Illuminati. Next a sign comes up with the words "bath haus of GaGa" - bath houses are known as places for homosexuals to have orgies. The dancers in the video open the white boxes they are in (there are seven boxes, one has the word monster and a cross on it,) and start to make their way out, these boxes very closely resemble coffins - skull and bones (Illuminati secret society based in Yale) practice masturbation in coffins. They start to slither out much like serpents - every person coming out of these coffins has a white PVC hat on (as well as being dressed in a white pvc outfit), this hat covers the eyes but not the mouth, at the top the pvc material is formed in to spikes - the dancers begin to move around like Zombies in a horror movie and then begin to clap as if to applaud their blindness, lady GaGa is in the bath fully clothed at this point which in itself is rather odd. We see lady GaGa standing in front of the mirror after the bath scene, posing in an odd way dressed in black wearing a hat very similar to that of the dancers in the other scene - I believe these hats may symbolise ownership, since the colours are well known Illuminati colours, lady GaGa'sGaGa in front of the mirror she slides her hand up her leg and down in to her crotch - which is masturbation, then she lifts her dress up slightly flashing herself in the mirror. When lady GaGa is shown next in the bath again she appears to have rather large pupils and seems to be on drugs or possessed by something evil - the dancer on the floor appears rather lost and disturbed when she is next shown, almost as if she has lost something on the floor. In the bath scenes, lady GaGa makes weird movements with the end joints of her fingers on one hand - she also shows herself making a gun shape with her fingers, exposing a tattoo which is considered to be the hippie sign for peace, really it is the old death rune, she is also wearing earrings which look like pyramids and seem to have a wire dangling from them as if they are earphones. All the while the dancers continue dances which seem to be a rip off of Michael Jackson's thriller video, they appear to be struggling to see and feel their way around - almost like a battle to cure their blindness, the movements clearly resemble blindness as well as showing stupidity - this symbolises being blind to the truth, stumbling on in a trance like state kept in the dark. It great exposes sheeple, this is basically showing how they see the people they have brainwashed - they see them as blind sheep who will remain blind. Lady GaGa is dragged from the bath and seems to be struggling as if frightened - the dancers when shown next have their arms stretched out and just move their hips, it is as if they are pushing lady GaGa symbolically. The two women who dragged lady GaGa from the bath seem to be dressed almost like nurses they sit her on the edge of the bath and then force a drink down her throat - which lady GaGa dribbles down her chin, which is a sexual reference referring to oral sex and ejaculation in the mouth - which she is then forced to swallow.

Lady GaGa is next shown being pulled about by the dancers who are tearing at her clothes, preparing her for exposure for men's pleasure she is wearing very little when the coat is pulled off of her body (she also appears to be struggling when next shown in the bath - as if fighting off the people who want to indecently expose her) - which is giving teenagers and children that being dressed in a degrading and slutty manner to benefit men is OK and that there is no shame in such disgusting behaviour, it is basically turning women in to mere sex objects for the benefit of men and teaching children that they should behave this way. Which is the Zionist dream, pornography was created by Zionist Jews - this is another way of degrading women and making them nothing more than a hole in the eyes of men - this has been so much that now porn is inescapable, it is in magazines like just17, which is mostly read by much younger teenagers and children who wish to feel older - this kind of imagery is mimicked by children who wish to seem more grown up and so act and dress like prostitutes. This is how children become sexualised, children are even portrayed this way in films, so that they become objects of lust for men - leading to paedophilia. The whole school girl uniform fantasy was also created by the Zionist's as a way of tempting men to lust after children. This explains the great rise in paedophilia cases of young rape cases which are basically paedophilia cases but classed differently by a ridiculous law.

The women dancers who ripped the clothes from lady GaGa seem very pleased with themselves after they have uncovered her - they are glancing at the men who are sat observing the whole thing, lady GaGa has now been turned in to a mere sex object and her morality been destroyed by these women. Despite this, lady GaGa at first tries to cover herself as if she does not want to be degraded and ogled by men - this scene is displaying an orgy again. Of the men that are shown, three seem to be wearing muzzles - symbolising that men are dogs and driven only by lust humping everything in site. Three men are showing visible tattoos, the middle man has a trident tattoo on one arm, and what appears to be a skull on the other arm, he also has death tattooed on his right shoulder - the man sat to his right has what looks like an ecto skeleton on his arm, and the man on left of the middle man has a very odd tattoo as well, which I struggled to make out as I progress through this video I may be able to work out what it is meant to be, hopefully. One of the men next shown has what looks like the chin part of a roman helmet strapped to his face, which I believe could symbolise controlled speech (political correctness) since it appears to almost be a kind of gag keeping him from speaking. This man has a tattoo on his neck which seems like a face, with hearts where the eyes should be, where the nose should be what looks similar to a cross creeps up above where the hearts are, but it also seems at the same time like rams horns making the cross - it is a very demonic looking tattoo.

Lady GaGa is next seen with her hand on her breasts and one hand in between her legs like she is masturbating, she is being carried by the other women in the scene. After this she is shown naked at either side of her are walls, in front of her is what looks like a cage keeping her inside these walls. It goes back to the previous scene where she is lowered to a standing position and begins to dance for the men - which is basically strip club dancing, giving children the impression that this is how to get men to like you, it also teaches children to be sex objects again and to be slags. The men sit watching the dancing which is for their entertainment - this is possibly to spur children on in to such demeaning jobs, Zionists love the idea of women and men being mere sex objects, obsessed with sex and having no standards just sleeping with anything in site - this is why they are destroying each generation more and more. The naked scene comes on again, this time Lady GaGa is leaning forward and her back bones stick out like that of a Ceratosaurus (which is basically a lizard, yes I am referring to David Ickes idea of the reptilian bloodline - I believe anything to be a possibility in this lifetime) this scene shows lady GaGa looking malnourished and diseased - the bone structure is not at all normal, it would take great tampering of the image or severe anorexia for such obvious sticking out of the bone, and even then this would mean she was close to dying - plus there would be many more bones sticking out, not just the spine. In the next dance scene (going back to the where the women are being watched by men), lady GaGa is thrown to the floor at the feet of the men being watched closely by these men - she stands up, lifts her leg and strokes in between her legs - which is showing masturbation for the men's pleasure, which again is teaching little girls to degrade themselves for the pleasure of men - it is telling little girls to touch themselves on a subconscious level - this kind of message can lead children in to early and obsessive masturbation. At the same time the leg movement is symbolic of a woman climbing on top of a man for sex and positioning his penis inside her - which is giving the message that children should be off having sex, this kind of imagery teaches promiscuity.

The next few dance moves are mostly hand gestures with slight hip movements - one such hand movement clearly shows the "wanking" hand gesture by all of the women dancers. Lady GaGa is seen naked again this time doing what seems to be a flicking movement - when you actually stop this at the precise moment she is about to flick, you see that she is making an eye with her finger (masonic symbol), and also making the shape of three sixes with her fingers - which is how the mind will process the image. Again in this scene she looks very reptilian with the way her back bone is sticking out in the way of spines. The next part of the dance shown is lady GaGa with her fingers touching making a with child movement by making out the shape of a pregnant belly with her arms. Which is basically telling these young children that the music is aimed at to get pregnant young (hence the teenage mum problem). In these scenes with the dancers, a fair few drinks of vodka (the same vodka bottles which were mentioned earlier) are poured out by the men watching the dancers - this is giving the message to drink heavily - alcohol is actually more dangerous and addictive than illegal drugs, as well as it dulling the senses and destroying brain cells. Lady GaGa is next seen crawling on her knees towards the men - teaching children to be slaves, not only slaves to the Zionist agenda, but also sex slaves. Lady GaGa climbs on top of of one of the men - this message again is sex she is riding him - teaching children again to have promiscuous sex - during this part she is seen making humping movements, then seen naked again moving her bottom as if having sex. A cat hisses at Lady GaGa while she is humping this man - the cat represents Bast (Bastet) Egyptian Goddess of the Rising Sun. The 'Cat Goddess'. And of course sun worship ties in with the Illuminati. The cat is a sphynx cat - which is also Egyptian again.

One of men pushes a button, then three laptop screens are shown (each laptop has a 6 on the back of it- there are three sixes - the devils number) where the men are bidding basically they are buying her, she is a prostitute selling her body to these men. Just before where the amount being bid is there is a letter P with a line going through just under the D shape of the letter - this is not a type of currency, it means prostitution - lady GaGa prostitution bid. This is telling children several messages, one that the body is not worth anything, it is merely for sexual pleasure, two that there is nothing wrong with prostitution, three that pornography is fine and being a porn star is fine - which it isn't because it degrades women and turns men in sex obsessed lust driven objects - and four it tells children that by using sex to make money they can become rich - it devalues love making, marriage and women. It also glorifies materialism over morals and respect for oneself.  And it is possible it represents the financial gain of the establishment from our obsession with materialism, as well as from their manipulation of the music and film industry.

Of the numbers shown on the bidding for lady GaGa I used the method for numerology and looked up the meanings of each number, so that I could ascertain as to whether they had any significance at all. Firstly the numbers shown are: 943 616 - 965 818 - 976 141 - and lady GaGa sells at 1000,000. I took the first set of numbers and added each single number together which came to 29 - then I added 2 + 9 which comes to 11, the numerological meaning behind this is:

"The 11 is known as the psychics number, it's the most intuitive of all numbers and it represents illumination and deep insight" - Notice Illumination = Illuminati.

"It acts as a channel for information between the higher and the lower." - The higher and the lower meaning classes of people (in the case of what the Zionist reasoning behind this numerology usage is) "a channel for information" - which means the brain washing we are subjected to, basically put together it means we are the lower class, beneath the Zionists, their slaves - and the people involved in spreading their lies and inflicting these brainwashing rituals upon us are the channel for information - from the Zionists, to us.

The next lot of numbers came to 37 - 3 + 7 = 10 For Pythagoras, 10 was the symbol of the universe and it also expressed the whole of human knowledge. Represent the Creator and the creation, 3 + 7, the Trinity resting in the expressed universe. Meaning that the creators are the Zionists and we are the creation - because they have destroyed what used to be our culture, and created a new one, along with inflicting a destructive way of thinking which is not our own. "It also expressed the whole of human knowledge" - we know only what we are told, through subliminal messages, media influences and lies the government are paid to tell us - Lady GaGa represents what knowledge we are fed through the subliminal messages, or more how our thoughts are manipulated in to thinking the way our Zionist rulers want us to. "The trinity resting in the expressed universe" - the trinity = Illuminati, resting in the expressed universe could mean the ideology they have created for us which is considered the logic of the universe (earth is what the real meaning is behind this, since earth is all we know to have been manipulated). It could also point to the fact that they do not follow what we are forced and brain washed in to following - they rest, we serve. "For the Mayans, it represents the end of a cycle and the beginning of another. The ten was regarded as being the number of the life and the death." Which could tie in to two things really, firstly the NWO as the beginning of a new cycle, secondly 2012, when the end of the world is predicted - interestingly by the Mayans. According to H.- P. Blavatsky, the 1 followed by 0 indicates the column and the circle, meaning the principle of the female and male, and this symbol would refer to the Androgyny nature and also to Jehovah, being at the same time male and female. Jehovah or yhwh - is the Jewish god, which may also be tied in with Zionists because they claim to be Jews, but the are not by race, only by religion.


The next lot of numbers when added came to 28 - 2 + 8 = 10. - Since 10 has already been discussed I do not need to mention it again.
Incidentally, Lady GaGa comes to the number 13 in numerology - 13 represents "all or nothing" through transformation pertaining to degeneration or regeneration. Symbolic death and rebirth is strongly associated to 13. An example of the representative power of the number 13 is transitioning from modest means to vast wealth 13 is considered a "Karmic Debt Number," - "All or nothing", which could represent how unless these pop stars who sell their souls to the Zionist devils willingly sacrifice their souls to such depravity, they will never get famous and their songs will never reach the charts, they must fully submit to Zionism. "Degeneration" - which could mean the deterioration of the Lady GaGa, also the part she plays in cause the degeneration of humanity. "symbolic death and rebirth" - the old person dying out, and being replaced by the Zionists tool, also the death of our way of life and moral standing - the rebirth of our degrading existence. "Transitioning from modest means to vast wealth" - the selling of oneself/the soul to the devil (Zionism) for financial gain. "Karmeric debt number" - the debt Lady GaGa pays by corrupting the generations with her music and videos, it is the price she pays for selling herself in order to get famous.

When I was looking up Jewish numerology, I found the symbolism of the number 13 - "For the cabalist, the number 13 is the meaning of the Snake, the dragon, Satan and the murderer." Which I found interesting, since the snake represents the leading astray of Adam and Eve. Obviously the dragon represents reptilian blood lines, and Satan well clearly it is the mark of what our Zionist elite worship. It clearly shows why such an odd name was picked.

Going back to the dance moves, Lady Gaga is next dancing with the other (supposed women, although it is questionable whether they are women or men in drag), the next few dances moves are mostly hand gestures (like the masturbation of a male) with the occassional humping gesture towards the men who are watching - basically whether these dancers are male or female - the message is to fancy the masculine appearance - which could explain the rise in homosexual/bisexual activity?!

The next bit that stood out to me the most is when Lady Gaga is seen in black underwear surrounded by clear diamonds floating in the air, as well as a room full of men sat around her, this is suggestive of group sex, and what is known as a 'spit-roast' - these diamonds represent male ejaculation being released on Lady Gaga. This is sending the message that group sex, and promiscuity in general are normal acts. Lady Gaga is now wearing a metal 'roman' style helmet (or at least the front face covering part of) - which again represents a muzzle - control.

There are two theories about what the metal ring costume represents, one that the rings represents other dimensions. And the other that it could represent the ring of saturn - which seems plausible (upon first sight of this image) when the significance of Saturn is looked up -

"Saturn, so active in the cosmic changes, was regarded by all mankind as the supreme god. Seneca says that Epigenes, who studied astronomy among the Chaldeans, “estimates that the planet Saturn exerts the greatest influence upon all the movements of celestial bodies.” (1)

On becoming a nova, it ejected filaments in all directions and the solar system became illuminated as if by a hundred suns. It subsided rather quickly and retreated into far-away regions."

Illumination represents the illuminati obviously, and the hundred suns is the sun worship.
Also, Lady Gaga's outfit seems somewhat robotic - which is basically the Zionist dream, to turn us in to mindless, emotionless, soul less slave robots that they can control. Two of the rings are almost inline with Lady Gaga's stomach next (Whereas the others were/are inline with her head), this is similar to what an atom looks like, and reminiscent of a portal to another dimension (as the rings keep separating), Lady Gaga places her hand out, as if testing a new dimension before she fully allows herself to step in to it. A pyramid tattoo is clearly visible on her arm, it probably even has the correct amount of stones (for it to be completely significant to Zionism - 13).

The next outfit we see Lady Gaga in is rather 'reptile' like, consisting of a scaley green and yellow suit. Lady Gaga makes a hand gesture which almost looks like the number six (which is shown three times). The body pose during this is almost like the Baphomet (church of Satan). Lady Gaga's sunglasses (why would she wear these indoors anyway? - Probably because it is a statement of sun worship), seem to come out to a point - like lizard eyes. The style of Lady Gaga's hair (during this reptile scene) is reminiscent of a desert horned lizard's spikes sticking out to the side and back of the head.

We again see Lady Gaga in the bath scene, this time with her hands around her throat, but arms extended upwards and outwards, which it seems rather odd to be throttling oneself. Lady Gaga appears in the fur (and full body including head) polar bear outfit. She is white room walking towards two rams heads on the wall - which is the traditional sign of the Devil. In this room there is a bed, on it a man is sat (the man who bid the highest for her earlier on the computer screens), with bedside tables (either side of the bed), with a lamp on each. The bed frame is shaped like a pyramid with the steps going up, and at the top the eye of Horus - this is faint but the subconscious mind would easily see it. It was actually by chance I came across, I was examining the man and bed scene and noticed the background. The lamps at either side represent the pillars of light - this scene is very masonic indeed. Lady Gag is shown with her sunglasses on, which show a reflection of everything just mentioned^^^ (again sunglasses indoors? - Also have you noticed that all the sunglasses she wears make her nose in to the shape of a pyramid with the cap stone missing - this is deliberate, remember these sunglasses are designed for her).

The man is wearing his muzzle still and unbuttons his shirt - he earlier paid for Lady Gaga's services (prostitution). Lady Gaga and her masculine dancers are in red for their next costume scene, lying on the floor, all positioned in the base of a pyramid (remember these scenes are deliberately laid out, it is not coincidence, every detail is thought out and planned). Lady Gaga strokes herself down her bust area in to her groin area (masturbation), She makes head movements almost like she is being humped hard. During this dance scene she makes very many sexually suggestive dance moves. When Lady Gaga is shown with very little make up on, she seems to be jerking her body somewhat, as if masturbating. She is then shown taking off her fur coat. When next seen in her reptile outfit, her shadow looks almost like an Egytian Pharaoh - if you look properly you can see it even seems to have a beard, whereas Lady Gaga does not, so this picture was obviously edited). Also, behind the shadow of Lady Gaga is another shadow, which looks almost like a demon (or like one of those Gargoyle statues seen on some buildings) creeping up behind her.

The room with the man and Lady Gaga (prostitute scene) is suddenly on fire, which starts behind the bed (representing the fire of hell - from an evil and sinful act). Lady Gaga in red is making almost robotic dance moves now along with her masculine dancers. Now Lady Gaga is shown in front of the flames. The (red suited) dance scenes continue to be somewhat robotic and look almost like she is having an epileptic fit with the strange hand and body movements. The bed is shown ablaze, then Lady Gaga poses in front of the burning bed - the fire behind her is a pyramid (of course), and her pose is definitely deliberate, but I'm not exactly sure what it represents yet. In red again Lady Gaga makes a pyramid shape over her eye with her fingers, which is her trademark really - it is showing ownership - the Zionist ownership of her soul. The man is now dead, burnt alive for his sins - Lady Gaga lays next to his corpse, with a bra that sparks - illumination. She is smoking a cigerrette - which in films is seen as a form of release after sexual activity has taken place, insinuating she has sold herself as a prostitute to the man for his sexual pleasure. This could be seen as a message to sell ones body through prostitution, and also pornography - both are degrading and wrong.

If you consider again, who are these songs and videos aimed at? Children! These songs and videos are shaping the opinions and future actions of each generation of children - hence why promiscuity is popular and common in todays younger generations.

Lyrics of the song 'Bad romance'.

This is so I can show the hidden meaning in what you may just consider odd wording, but it is never coincidence, it is always deliberate. Our brain filters our conception of reality, principally by means of the interpretation of the three archetypes: Music, words and images. These people know this, they use it to manipulate the masses with subliminal messages.


Oh-oh-oh-oh-oooh!
Oh-oh-oh-oooh-oh-oh-oh!
Caught in a bad romance
Oh-oh-oh-oh-oooh!
Oh-oh-oh-oooh-oh-oh-oh!
Caught in a bad romance
Rah rah ah-ah-ah! - Ra, is the Egytian sun God, (merged with Horus)
Ro mah ro-mah-mah

- Romah - could be 'roam', as in to roam, (without direction, aimless wondering, roamers - 'gypsies').

Gaga Ooh-la-la!
Want your bad romance

Rah rah ah-ah-ah!
Ro mah ro-mah-mah
Gaga Ooh-la-la!
Want your bad romance

I want your ugly

- When Lady Gaga sings this she is looking in the mirror, she is basically saying she wants you to feel inferior 'ugly' - which leads to vanity, obsession with appearances.

I want your disease
- Why would she want a disease? The disease represents illness (obviously, but inflicted like the illnesses caused by the poisonous toxins we daily have forced upon us, through food, water, medication etc). It also means your mental illness - the destruction of your mind.

I want your everything
As long as it’s free
- She wants everything - if it's free - doesn't that sound like the 'doley scrounger' mentality, 'I want everything for free'. It's telling people to take take take. To rely on a fragile benefits system.

I want your love
Love-love-love
I want your love
- She wants you to idolise her, to love her - because then her words and actions can affect you even more. Which means you are more open to the suggestive nature of her songs. The magic of symbolism (in Zionist belief) relies on your submission to it.

I want your drama
The touch of your hand
- When she sings this, she strokes her hand down inbetween her leg and lifts her dress, exposing private area in front of the mirror - this is a sexual suggestion.  As always in modern music, the focus is on sex.  The idea is to make men and women fantasize and be dominated by their lusts. 

I want you leather-studded kiss in the sand  - Leather studded kiss?  Could be a suggestion of kinky clothing.
I want your love
Love-love-love
I want your love
Love-love-love
I want your love

You know that I want you
And you know that I need you
- Submissive to her Zionist leaders - she relies on them for fame. 

I want it bad - Sex again.
Your bad romance

I want your loving
And I want your revenge
- Sex. And revenge - a retaliation to something,

You and me could write a bad romance
(Oh-oh-oh-oh-oooh!)
I want your loving
All your love is revenge
You and me could write a bad romance
- All your love is revenge? Almost as if the sexual act taking place is a retaliation to something?
Oh-oh-oh-oh-oooh!
Oh-oh-oh-oooh-oh-oh-oh!
Caught in a bad romance

Oh-oh-oh-oh-oooh!
Oh-oh-oh-oooh-oh-oh-oh!
Caught in a bad romance

Rah rah ah-ah-ah!
Ro mah ro-mah-mah
Gaga Ooh-la-la!
Want your bad romance

I want your horror
I want your design
- Lady Gaga wants you at your worst - she wants you to be illiterate, stupid and evil, mere objects of lust and obsession (With the material objects). She wants you to be a certain way 'a design' - which has been planned out for you by way of fashion, magazines, music videos and TV etc.

‘Cause you’re a criminal
As long as your mine
- You're a criminal, as long as 'your' (should be you're, but that was how the lyrics were written) mine? She is expressing her hold over you here, she controls 'you' - you're 'hers'. An object that she shapes. She wants you to be a criminal, to be nothing more than a lazy parasite.

I want your love - So that you keep buying and being influenced by her music.
Love-love-love
I want your love, uhh

I want your psycho
Your vertigo stick
- Not only does this not make sense, but it is also a message for you to suffer from psychosis. And vertigo stick - is obviously a penis, vertigo implies 'infected', therefore she wants sex and is promoting promiscuity, as well as telling you that STDs are no big deal, don't worry about it, it's only an STD, have sex never mind. Basically that is the message.

Want you in my room
When your baby is sick
- Again, not only do the lyrics not make sense or have any purpose (in the way that they are to the conscious mind stating nothing at all), but obviously again sex is being mentioned. The mention of a 'baby' seems quite odd. This could be a mention of an actual baby, which would seem very sick to be honest - or it could be a mention of a partner, infidelity.  Or a hint that children are being made sick by the state.


I want your love
Love-love-love
I want your love
Love-love-love
I want your love

You know that I want you
And you know that I need you
(‘Cause I’m a freak bitch, baby!)
I want it bad
Your bad romance
- She is saying she is desperate for sex - teaching people to become slaves to their lusts, nothing more than mere sex objects and materialistic ones at that!



I want your loving
And I want your revenge
You and me could write a bad romance
(Oh-oh-oh-oh-oooh!)
I want your loving
All your love is revenge
You and me could write a bad romance

Oh-oh-oh-oh-oooh!
Oh-oh-oh-oooh-oh-oh-oh!
Caught in a bad romance

Oh-oh-oh-oh-oooh!
Oh-oh-oh-oooh-oh-oh-oh!
Caught in a bad romance

Rah rah ah-ah-ah!
Ro mah ro-mah-mah
Gaga Ooh-la-la!
Want your bad romance

Work-work fashion baby
Work it
move that bitch crazy
Work-work fashion baby
Work it
move that bitch crazy
Work-work fashion baby
Work it
move that bitch crazy
Work-work fashion baby
Work it
I’m a freak bitch baby
- Here she is telling you to work - in other words to be a slave, and she mentions fashion which she also wishes you to be a slave to.


I want your love
And I want your revenge
I want your love
I don’t wanna be friends
- Here is an obvious mention of a 'one night stand', she doesn't want anything more than sex basically (telling you that sex means nothing, and relationships mean nothing) - she doesn't want to think of her sexual conquests as 'people', just as objects of her desire -which is how she wants you to see people also.


J'veux ton amour
Et je veux ton revenge
J'veux ton amour
I don't wanna be friends

Oh-oh-oh-oh-oooh!
(I don't wanna be friends)
Oh-oh-oooh-oh-oh!
Caught in a bad romance

(I don't wanna be friends)
Oh-oh-oh-oh-oooh!
Oh-oh-oooh-oh-oh!
(Want your bad romance)
Caught in a bad romance
(Want your bad romance)

I want your loving
I want your revenge
You and me could write a bad romance
(Oh-oh-oh-oh-oooh!)
I want your loving
All your love is revenge
You and me could write a bad romance

Oh-oh-oh-oh-oooh!
(Want your bad romance)
Oh-oh-oooh-oh-oh!
Caught in a bad romance
(Want your bad romance)
Oh-oh-oh-oh-oooh!
(Want your bad romance)
Oh-oh-oooh-oh-oh!
Caught in a bad romance

Rah rah ah-ah-ah!
Ro mah ro-mah-mah
Gaga Ooh-la-la!
Want your bad romance




Obviously, these lyrics and images are planned out by the Zionist leaders. Lady Gaga is a mere tool for delivering the messages, but she still is playing her part in the destruction of young impressionable minds nonetheless. Most of the 'big' singers used to push subliminal messages, started out as trusted figures (when the elite actually bothered to cover their tracks, they are obviously over confident these days), they claimed to be religious, wrote seemingly innocent songs etc etc. And now that they're sending these messages, they have already gained parental trust, therefore no one expects them to be destroying young minds, this allows the songs and images to cause the mental destruction of each generation.

The lyrics that don't make sense on a conscious level - are rearranged to something that makes sense to the sub conscious.  It is a form of hypnotism and most people are unaware of it.  The fact that the message makes no sense on a conscious level should raise the awareness of anyone.  But apparently  it goes more unnoticed than the direct approach which would awaken your conscious to the fact that it is being hypnotised.

Even when you're aware of the problem with this kind of music, if you still listen to it, you're still being influenced by it.  And it makes you a part of the problem.  Don't listen to this kind of music.  It is demon worship and is hypnotising people in to actions that would not be considered normal or decent in a sane and civilised society.  Do your brain a favour, listen to something decent.  Read a book instead of a magazine.  And don't allow your mind to be further destroyed.

Saturday, 19 November 2011

1984 is upon us.



George Orwell's "1984", explains a future of slavery. Manipulation. Fear causes oppression, allowing mass control. It also describes how the English language will be altered. Words removed and replaced. Amazingly, this has been happening for years now. And goes almost completely unnoticed. Obviously, his predictions are coming true.

The English dictionary is constantly being doctored.  Perfectly acceptable words, such as "gay", "queer", "fag", "tramp", "nigger" etc, have been moved.  Just to clarify (in case the liberals come after me), the word "nigger", derives from "negro" - meaning black person.  And is therefore neither offensive, nor an incorrect word!  These words are now deemed offensive by the "thought police".  How can the word "gay" be offensive, when it merely describes feeling happy?  Or the word queer, meaning strange, odd, eerie etc.  However these words are being erased from the English language.

To add insult to injury, absolutely absurdly nonsensical, not to mention nonexistent words are replacing them!  A few examples of these ridiculous words are: "Paining", "OMG" (I know, not even a word!), "LOL", "<3" (Oxford English dictionary - what a pile of excrement, eh?!), etc.  It makes me wonder how long before such stupidity takes the form of: "putted" instead of put.  Or "worser" instead of worse.  And amazingly, people use these retarded NON words.  Perhaps they were ill taught them in schools, or heard them on TV.  Whatever the case, I never believed anyone could be so foolish!  And all in the name of progress?

This supposed progress, is so backwards, as to destroy the entire English language.  I believe these non words are known as "newspeak". Ironically, described with another non word.

Why, would anyone wish to destroy an entire language?  Well, the human brain thinks in words, sound waves and images.  Words, well without them we cannot express thoughts.  If words are limited, then our thoughts are also limited.  Thus freedom of speech does not exist, nor does freedom of thought. 

By replacing great words with the ever retarded "OMG", we not only lose freedom of speech. We also greatly lose our ability to think freely. Through political correctness, or censorship we are more easily controlled - pushed in to thinking a certain way.  Sure, at home we can say whatever pleases us.  But what about at work? School? Etc.  We feel compelled to follow the herd by watching our words.  After all, we're terrified of being labelled an "ism" (racist, homophobic etc).  These "ism's" were created to scare people out of expressing themselves freely.  And it obviously works.  Since the "liberal thought police" use these "ism's" to insult and separate us from the herd, so that those who do not fall for political correctness feel isolated and afraid of the consequences of not falling in line.

"Article 10, Freedom of Expression of the Human Rights Act 1998, which is a qualified right, states everyone has the right of freedom of expression. This right shall include freedom to hold opinions and to receive and impart information and ideas without interference by public authority and regardless of frontiers. This guarantees the right to pass information to other people and to receive information that other people want to give to you. It also guarantees the right to hold and express opinions and ideas."

The above, is a legal article regarding free speech. It clearly states that anyone and everyone is entitled to freely express their personal opinions.  Liberals would have us believe this is only acceptable when we are not going against political correctness.  But free speech cannot be censored, otherwise, it's not free!

Political correctness and changing the English language is destroying our culture.  It is encouraging stupidity.  And mostly, it is ruining a wonderful language, one that should be cherished.  Please, don't fall for the lie that these new words are in the name of progress.  Because in truth, they are bringing our downfall.

George Orwell's 1984:
http://www.george-orwell.org/1984/0.html