Saturday, 24 December 2011

The birth of Christ-Mas - Jewish materialism.


Christmas, a time of the year when we can all spend our money on materialistic, not to mention badly crafted rubbish, get drunk, eat like pigs and lie to our children about a big fat man in a red suit who comes down your chimney (even if you do not have one) and brings presents to good little boys and girls who have been nice and politically correct, used to be a celebration of something a bit more important than the ability of slaves in China to produce plastic crap for rich exploiters to get even richer off, although I can't remember exactly, but I think it may have been to do with the birth of God in human form...

And of course as usual, the Jewish run film industry enforces the true meaning of Christmas - to buy expensive objects that in reality are worth little more than pennies, in order to show your love to family and friends.  The religious aspect proves to be a bit of in an inconvenience for the Jews really seeing as Christianity promotes everything wholesome and decent that they have worked so hard to destroy.

Originally, the big fat man known as father Christmas or Santa Claus - was a part of the Coca Cola advertising.  The original Father Christmas known to English speaking countries, was depicted from St Nickolas - and was the spirit of Christmas cheer suited in green.  The original father Christmas was in no way associated with present giving or the modern day materialistic and perverted Christmas cheer.  In 1931, Coca Cola began advertising their Father Christmas as being associated with present giving, fridge raiding and playing with children awaiting his arrival.  The idea was to introduce a commercialised version of Christmas, preferred by Jews to be referred to as Xmas - to disassociate the connection with Christ.  It is the 80th anniversary of this fat kiddie fiddling, materialist Jew it must be time for this old nonce to be put in a home, or in the true spirit of materialism we could always save a few quid and have him euthanized?!

Christmas is not the only time that Christianity is mocked by Christ murdering Jews, typically any time of year Christianity, or simply God himself is subject to blatant Jewish hatred and blasphemy.  The Zionist/Talmudist/Jewish run film industry constantly refers to Christianity or any belief of God in a less than complimentary light.

*In popular American TV shows such as the Simpson's - Homer refers to God as his favourite fictional charactor.  Despite being an alleged Christian.

*In Mr Beans ultimate disaster movie - the American Jew playing alongside Mr Bean upon seeing a Mr Bean mishap, states 'Jesus of Nazerath'.

*Jewish comedian Sarah Silverman states she would kill Christ again.  As well as saying Jesus was Gay.

These are just three examples of the Jewish defaming of Christianity.  Why do they so desperately need to destroy Christianity?!  Because Christianity teaches people that what they do in this life influences the outcome of their afterlife.  If they are bad they will go to hell.  If they are good they will go to heaven.  It gives people a reason to behave themselves.  Whereas the Jewish created ideology Atheism promotes the lie that there is no afterlife and therefore we do not need to behave in a decent and morally acceptable manner, because we will not be punished for any sin we commit or harm we cause.  It also turns generally good souls away from God - and to the Jewish created sins in the form of alleged entertainment. 

Christmas no longer mentions the birth of Christ - God in human form, instead of being a religious celebration, it is a used as a means to scam people out of large amounts of money - and to further push the materialistic modern way of life.  We have become obsessed with this materialism.  Christmas also pushes the backwards idea of allowing ones children to sit on the lap of a paedophile (seeing as they're the only ones who go for such demeaning jobs) and demand materialistic rubbish.  We tell our children to never talk to strangers, get in strangers cars or accept sweets, but come Christmas we sit them on the lap of a child molester in the spirit of modern materialist Christmas?!

Evolution is used as a means to disparage belief in a divine being.  Although still remaining a mere theory, just as religion, Evolutionists claim it to be a fact (an unprovable one).  Evolution is the theory of a large number of coincidences, based on the theory of the coincidence of the big bang.  But no matter what, no species has ever been bred to produce an entirely new species.  Since no species is capable of changing its DNA structure.  And the big bang theory of the sudden gas collision, fails to answer one very important question, where did the gases come from?!  Even the modern decadence known as sex change helps to disprove the evolution theory, you can give a man extensive cosmetic surgery and artificial hormones, even a female name - but he will still remain a man, because you cannot change his chromosomes.

Evolution also forgets to mention the intelligent design to life.  A simple look at Bacterium Flagellum Motor seen in the video above.  Which is more than likely where the modern machine design ideas came from in the first place.  The Jews have had this knowledge for centuries, they just don't share it.  They destroy our minds with lies, but keep themselves well educated in the facts of life.  Everything has a purpose and an intelligent design - such does not come from a coincidence.

In order to destroy the morality of world, first the religious belief had to be diminished.  Christianity has been subjected to scrutiny for many years now.  This has helped the religion to shrink significantly.  Especially in England, a once very religious and morally aware country.  This lack of faith quickly helped such forms of debauchery as pornography, homosexuality (and other mental illnesses such as transsexualism), perversion, materialism, gluttony, lust, greed etc be accepted by the once moral masses.  And is not only a means of control, but as well as damning the souls of the masses, it is a way to aggravate and challenge God.

Atheism and lack of faith in general allowed for such perversions and mental illnesses as homosexuality and transsexualism to be legalised and labelled as 'lifestyle choices' or 'sexual preference'.  Which of course further condemns Christianity for its preachings against sexual perversions.  And works towards destroying the family way of life through promoting the homosexual promiscuity.

Christianity has been dispraised beyond belief with no aftermath, it is just seen as humour.  Whereas if one was to criticise Judaism, or simply read a verse from the Talmud outloud in a public place, one would be arrested and charged with inciting religious and racial hatred.  This being because the Jews run the world.  But what very few ever wonder is why the Talmudic verses would cause such a stir?!  Could it be because they promote hatred, murder and rape of non Jews?!  As well as showing racial supremacy?!  But it matters not what their text states, only how the public may react to it being read aloud.

And not only do the Jews destroy and diminish our beliefs in their propaganda, but they also impose us with their own beliefs and depraved culture.  In their films we are shown pretty much only Jewish weddings, never Christian ones.  And in America circumcision is pretty much required these days.  Circumcision is propagandized as being healthy and clean, whereas uncircumcised men are portrayed as unclean and undesireable.
If God did not want men to have foreskins, why did he create them?!  God created man in his image, I doubt he would have made such a mistake.  The Jews are trying to correct God's mistakes - which is basically Satanism.  The Zionist Jews wish to push us all to sin for this reason.  They worship Satan and help him to destroy and damn the souls of the masses.

The Jews want you to worship Mammon, rather than God.  That is why Christmas has been destroyed and turned in to a shopping frenzy.  We have been pushed in to acting out sins such as greed, gluttany, lust, materialism, vanity etc through celebrations such as Christmas, easter and non religious ones such as mothers day etc, we are worshipping Mammon through committing the Jewish promoted sins against the wish of God.  They are sins because they destroy society and our soul.  They ruin us through causing obsession and breaking our connection to nature and the spiritual.  And these sins are typically Jewish ideas and behaviours anyway.  Do not fall for the commercialised Christmas.

Monday, 19 December 2011

Sunday, 18 December 2011

Radical feminists: man hating Lesbians.


The ideology of feminism first came to light in the early 19th and 20th century (first wave feminism), under the guise of fighting for equality and a woman's right to be involved in the running of the country.  The suffrage movements encouraged women to believe they were being oppressed.  The movement proposed that women fight for suffrage (the right to vote) and to be treated as equals to men.
Women from middle class backgrounds were easily persuaded by the notion.  And no doubt the media lies did little to advise them otherwise.

Feminism was created as a way to separate a woman from her nature.  And to destroy the family way of life, by convincing women that they were being oppressed in fulfilling their natural instincts in life - to procreate, raise their family and look after the household, in other words be a housewife and mother.  How can such an important role be seen as a chore, or state of oppression?!

The real reason feminism was so desperately pushed was to allow for the free sex (women) to be enslaved just as men had for centuries.  Although the ideology ignores the fact that lower class females and children had been forced to work in criminally dangerous work conditions in order to survive.  Feminism was never about equality.  It was about separating a wife from her husband, a mother from her child, destroying the family life and connection between mother and child - in order to create even more slaves of the female middle class variety.

Second wave feminist activity began in the early 1960s, and suggested that patriarchal family life oppressed women.  It promoted the idea that looking after children was a chore.  And women were wasting their potential, potential meaning ability to be a slave to the establishment perhaps?!  Domesticity soon became something to be ashamed of.  Women were told to believe that there was something negative about fulfilling the role of a housewife or mother.

In 1949 Simone de Beauvoir concluded that women were perceived as the "The Second Sex", in her work, merely because of their ability to menstruate, procreate and lactate.
Which again promotes a woman's natural instincts and role in life as something negative.

Betty Friedan, in her book "The Feminine Mystique", she stated that the family image of that time was degrading to women and did not reflect happiness.  Exactly what part of a mother raising and nurturing her child as nature intended, is degrading to women?!  It is the most important role in existence.  A mother is responsible for moulding and shaping her children in to who they will be as adults, and her children are a credit to her.  This sickening book was responsible for the kick start of the second wave of feminism, which allowed for middle class women to become slaves to the establishment just as lower class women already had in despicable conditions.

Second wave feminism still seems like a noble movement in today's mindset, as it supposedly fought for equality in pay and such.  However, as it stands the supposed inequality in pay was justifiable in some ways.  Men were paid more because they were the sole providers for their family.  And were capable of much more strenuous work.  Whereas single women were only providing for themselves or parents, and were capable of less in terms of strength.  This ideology would later allow single women to provide for out-of-wedlock children.  And for those children to be left with state indoctrinated 'carers'.  Thus diminishing the family life and parent-child bond.

In modern society, feminism has taken an even more destructive and radical turn - being mainly an ideology for man hating lesbians.  And many of these man haters are in powerful, or at least important positions and so have a great influence in political or influential terms.

Radical feminism goes so far as to call for the violent slaughter of men and male children.  Its political influence has oppressed men for years using the lie of sexism to further destroy a mans rights.  If the fight were truly ever for equality, men would also be allowed to experience some.  However, as it stands men are being punished, as it seems, for their supposed crimes of treating women as housewives and mothers.  Or in other, more truthful words, looking after them and keeping them from a life of slavery.

Radfem hub (Radical feminist), is a website recently exposed for emphasising articles from man hating feminists, of a severely destructive and violent nature.
Here is the entire article exposing how feminists REALLY think:  http://www.avoiceformen.com/feminism/radfem-hub-the-underbelly-of-a-hate-movement/

The article shows screen shots of feminists and their opinions of how to deal with men.  Some of which I will post below.

 Laila Namdarkhan (screen name “ybawife”), a well known feminist activist who was instrumental in passing legislation in the U.K. Regarding the mental health of women in prisons;
Above calling for the abortion of male babies.  And justifying it by stating female babies have been aborted.  Not only sickening, but also a retarded mentality.  Feminists are mentally ill from being indoctrinated and raped mentally by the establishment and media lies.  The comment exposes a truly unhealthy and sexist attitude towards males of any age.

Danielle Pynnonen (screen name “Allecto”), a child care worker whose employer is unknown;
 This child care worker is obviously incapable of looking after children.  She has an unhealthy attitude towards the males she 'supposedly' cares for and holds them in contempt for merely having the XY chromosome.  She refers to the male she cares for as a future rapist, and clearly this is how she sees all males.  She is a serious threat to children, and males especially for this reason.  
 Kat Pinder (screen name “Amazon Mancrusher”), a community development coordinator for the City of Perth in Australia and former U.K. Game show Big Brother contestant;
 This feminist suggests that men should be raped and battered (as if men are never victims of these things anyway, women also batter their husbands it is very common, just less reported because of the embarrassment factor), and also she describes general housework as a degrading task that men should have to endure to suffer as women have - although it is not degrading at all it is merely a part of life.  She then refers to low paid jobs - although this hasn't been an issue for some time for women.  And many men do have to work in low paid and degrading jobs.  She also mentions men should be purchased from brothels.  She is suggesting that women are forced in to that line of work, however this is far from true.  Most women who do this, choose to because it is easy money.  Or they wish to pay for their drugs.  And in most cases where a woman or young girl is forced in to prostitution, in England alone, it is due to Asian drug dealers - who get them hooked on heroin and then coerce them in to paying for the drugs through sexual activity with the dealer and his friends.  Eventually the dealer pimps her out to other Asians who may not be in his tight circle of friends.  This is a well known fact in the drugs intervention services.  Although it is not highly publicised because it may promote racial hatred.

 Mary Syrett (screen name “Mary Sunshine”), a writer and member of the City of Kingston Arts Council in Ontario, Canada;
This woman suggests that women should not nurture their male babies.  She states that females are forced to give birth to baby boys, but after that a woman can choose not to care for him and ensure his development.  She constantly refers to it being a woman's choice what to do with a male baby after birth - she seems to hint at a tremendously savage solution to the male population problem.  And she obviously is very against a male future - she would perhaps prefer men to never be needed and for all procreation to be artificial.  And this is seen as a sane mentality?!

 Lorraine Allen (screen name “White Tiger”), a special education teacher at The Center for Discovery Hurleyville, New York;
 A special education teacher - I believe this means she works with mentally handicapped children?  And at the boys statement, which he probably does not even fully understand the meaning of, she suggests that she would like to throw him out of an unopened window.  And she is allowed to work closely with children?!  Sickening isn't it?!

 Man hating feminist lesbians have an unhealthy attitude towards all men.  Many feminists with these disgusting, utterly destructive and dangerous opinions hold strong influential positions and are working towards changing the political aspects and laws.  They basically wish to imprison men with the same kind of oppression they're supposedly against.  They have been raised to hate men.  But because they're feminists they are allowed to have their evil man hating opinions.  Such is the way of political correctness, in a maddened and corrupt society.

The establishment have gained greatly from this self destructive attitude, the family has been destroyed.  Children are raised by a paedophile state that daily destroys their mind with lies, women have been enslaved.  Feminism has corrupted women to the point of sexual perversion and violent hatred of men.  Control of the masses has been gained.  In first destroying women, they had half the population.  Then they killed off the strong men in the wars, leaving behind the weak to breed a generation of weaklings and intellectually inferior shadows of the former greatness.  Now we are left with the heavily indoctrinated rubble, that mindlessly follow, and feel an indescribable need to be led.  Very few see past the establishment and media lies and propaganda.  The education systems ensure that the younger generations do not question this cancerous way of life.  Thus allowing control to remain in the hands of the hand picked Zionist/Talmudist establishment.

Saturday, 17 December 2011

More BBC propaganda:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-16175795
The above BBC article uses black and white photography to disguise the criminal Nordine Amrani's true roots.  It is a sordid attempt to portray him as Belgian, rather than what he actually is - Moroccan.  The reason for this is because the BBC propaganda network couldn't possibly allow the world to realise just how bad the foreign crime is.  It might be cause for concern.  As well as waking people up to the fact that multiculturalism does not work.  If you stick a turd in with a load of decent food, the turd doesn't become edible or decent, it soils the food completely.  The same goes for the ideology of sticking criminals and scum in decent neighbourhoods and countries - the good does not rub off on them, their bad rubs off on the decent people, thus creating more scum.  And naturally that is the idea.  Of course the rich will not suffer the same injustice.  They can afford to not live next door to paedophiles, murderers, rapists and thieves.

Amrani had been in trouble with the police pretty much all of his life.  He was due in court on the day of his attack, killing at least four people and wounding 120.  And though he had been in trouble before for growing cannabis and possessing a large arsenal, he was acquitted for having the correct permissions. 

As usual the BBC, like all official media networks, does its very best to keep race out of the crime.  Regardless of the fact that race does play a major part in crime statistics.  This is to supposedly protect the human rights of the criminal.  The same does not go in the case of a white criminal - especially when the crime is supposedly a racist attack - in which case the white shall be ridiculed and the entire white race deemed racist for it.

In one recent case of supposed racism in England, which can be found on youtube: 'My tram experience'.  A white woman daring to voice her opinion was filmed, the woman was arrested for speaking freely and her child placed in to care - where it will no doubt be mentally, physically and emotionally molested by the state.  Well done multiculturalism and freedom, once again you have served us well.
The police conveniently ignored the black man behind her, who was about to get up and violently assault the woman in question, his girlfriend persuaded him not to though.  I suppose in the eyes of the law he was provoked and therefore it was not his fault?!  Although the white woman could not possibly have been provoked by any of the foreigners around her, that could never happen.

What is the world coming to?!

Thursday, 15 December 2011

Free speech for the silent:



Once again a classic example of censorship of free speech has hit the headlines in the form of a student Natasha Burge, 19 of Windsor high school.  This student was suspended from her school for daring to exercise her right to freedom of speech.  Her supposedly intolerant opinion, written on facebook, was reported by another student to the school authorities.  How her personal opinions and comments on facebook affect the school authorities I really would like to know?!

The student simply suggested that Christmas was being abandoned and so was the national anthem - to appease our foreign guests.  Which is very true in many cases.

Natasha Burge's comment, Nov. 3 suggesting those who feel offended by Christmas celebrations and the singing of the national anthem at school should “please feel free to go back to your own (expletive) country,”

Burge goes on to suggest walking through Kennedy Collegiate dressed up as Santa and “screaming merry Christmas to the arabs, pakis, towel heads and whatever other race that doesn't like it.”
I would have thought a more pressing issue to be what on earth a fictional character, that used to represent coca cola, has to do with a religious celebration such as Christmas?!

The article, as well as the school board portray her opinion as racist and intolerant.  The idea is to squash any form of free speech, obviously this only counts if you are white skinned.  If you are foreign you can do or say as you please according to the infinite wisdom of the government and injustice system.
 
Burge stated (quite rightly so), if you don't like my comment don't read it, remove me from your friend list, don't report me.  She was wrongfully suspended for simply having an opinion.  
Public school board spokesman Scott Scantlebury attempts to justify the censorship of free speech, as well as using facebook as a way to attack students for daring to think freely.  Obviously the spokesman is a product of the heavy indoctrination system he so willingly enforces upon others.

Rachel Olivero, diversity officer with the Greater Essex County District School Board, states;
"When it comes to free speech, people are entitled to their opinions — until it reaches a point of intolerance."
Have you ever heard anything more retarded in your life?!  In response to such stupidity I say, "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." Voltaire.

The official media and education system are simply used to enforce the multi culti nonsense, that involves one race (whites) licking the back end of every other race.  And losing their freedom in the name of supposed tolerance.

And the only race daft enough to fall for such is the white race.  Amazing really.  We dig our own graves by allowing such lunacy.  Whatever happened to looking after your own people?!  We are too busy chastising our fellow man because we have been conditioned to police each other against freedom of speech.  This self destructive behaviour has already caused a great deal of problems.  And it will only get worse.

Sunday, 4 December 2011

Break from the herd!



Voting for a certain political party exists to give the impression that choice and freedom are actually a part of everyday life. The fact is, ALL politicians are corrupt, and all have the exact same agenda. Each party lies in order to gain votes, however it seems that whichever party is destined to next be in power is broadcast more so than the other parties - posted on billboards and such to influence the easily brainwashed with promises these politicians do not intend to keep. But this is merely scratching the surface regarding the problems with corrupt governments.


The mentality of the majority is that the people in power simply cannot be corrupt, they are not capable of doing anything other than what is best, what is right for the country and it's inhabitants. This kind of bizarre ideology apparently rules out any chance of corruption in any government - because according to the 'controlled' masses, people in places of power would not be in that position unless they had the 'peoples' best interest at heart. One point I would like to make is that people with evil intentions, always attempt to apply for positions working in areas where they can satisfy their evil intentions - for example, paedophiles tend to work in jobs close to children - such as schools and priesthood etc. This is common knowledge. So why then is it so difficult for people to believe that a government could be corrupt? My belief is that the mind is very simple in that of the masses - we cannot think behind the smoke screen we are provided, mostly due to daily influences which form our opinions for us such as TV, Billboard advertisements, radio, newspapers etc.


Politicians are basically puppets, used as a scape goat to keep our attention diverted from our true rulers - the evil Zionists. In effect, our view of politicians is that they control what decisions are made in our country - therefore when things start to go wrong, or start to ruin lives who do we instantly blame? The face of the public, the government! In the very same sentence, many people will also say 'But what can we do', so basically people believe their votes count - yet also believe they have no control over any decisions the people they supposedly voted for make? How can such lunacy still be classed as freedom? Yet the brainwashed will always believe they are free because the cage is not a physical one, nor is it in anyway visible - the chains are both financial and mental. The reason people maintain such a passive attitude towards life as it is, is because of lithium in the water. Lithium is prescribed for manic depression - it is said to lesson anger, aggression and agitation, this keeps the masses placid as they're financially ruined, physically and mentally destroyed, poisoned, and enslaved by Zionist puppet masters. It keeps the people from questioning the dozens of new and ludicrous rules made daily, the destruction of language, and it keeps the masses from doing anything to stop this enslavement of mankind.


The idea of the politicians is to provide something to keep our attention, a flashy sign or billboard to focus our minds on the immediate problem, so we may never see what lies beyond this sign. Our Zionist rulers are very intelligent, they can see far beyond what our simple minds can even begin to process. Whereas we may only be able to think a few steps ahead of ourselves, they are constantly thing a hundred steps ahead of themselves. And because our brain capacity is so limited, we assume that every bodies brain capacity is just as limited. We seem only able to see in black and white regarding matters of great importance - we cannot see the many possible hints of colour because our minds cannot grasp such complexities. This is exactly what allows the Zionist puppet masters to have such control over everything. Not only that, but also they have many puppets who are happy to play a small part in the destruction of the world - for a price I dare say, money or maybe just the promise of life while the rest of the disposable humans are being wiped out.

The Zionist plan is to leave at most five hundred million people to live out their lives as slaves, and wipe the rest of the seven thousand million population out. This plan has been in action for some time now, and is already killing people in a slow and painful manner. It starts with poisonous chemicals being forced upon our fragile immune systems from birth, by way of vaccination - and continues with any medication we are prescribed in our lifetime, as well as the harmful chemicals found in food/water, and the sky (chem trails). Such chemicals and metals as - mercury, formaldehyde, aspartame, saccharin, sorbitol, fluoride etc, which cause brain damage, cancer and many other health problems. Here is a link to a list of diseases and symptoms linked to vaccinations:
http://www.know-vaccines.org/parent.html


Do some research to find out hidden dangers in food, water and vaccinations/all pharmacy medications - make sure that any food you consume is free from the above mentioned chemicals. Don't make the mistake of thinking such things would not be approved by the FDA if they were unsafe, or that any level of such things in food or drinks will be low therefore cannot be all that damaging - any level of these chemicals is very damaging, and YES the FDA would approve such dangerous things, and they do!


The biggest problems however are that people are not aware of the Zionist influence, and truly think they're free and have options, as well as the fact that they believe that this physical existence is the only reality. But in actual fact, the physical doesn't exist at all - take atoms for example the smallest form of matter, everything is made up of atoms. Atoms are hollow, which means nothing can be solid, nothing physical can truly exist in anything more than our imagination. Or more to the point, our perception of existence. This physical reality we see before us, is where other life forms meet, where we share the same confused perception of life - this is not natural. We live in this existence now because we were manipulated in to doing so, such an existence is easier to control, through fear, vanity, materialism, laws etc.

The relevance of the above mentioned reality would be that it ties in with what many fail to understand, our brain capacity is so limited, we are basically only able to see on in black and white - in terms of our level of intelligence and perception. Whereas our Zionist rulers can see far beyond what we have been trained to accept as reality, hence why such complex problems are difficult for the masses to grasp, although in some cases they wish to remain ignorant.


To go back to my original point, if we have these rather fruitless choices such as differing (in appearance only of course) political parties and votes, choices of 'set' (controlled) opinions (provided by TV, radio and political correctness), and more tedious choices such as which football team to support, which type of 'set' fashion to follow, which channel of TV propaganda to follow, which controlled personality to take on, or politically correct/incorrect opinion to take on etc. Such ineffectual decisions lead to the misconception of freedom - if the cage is not visible, we will not fight it! But in effect, once you break free from this indoctrination, the cage is visible - you can see the mental and financial cage. The control is apparent in the outrageous bills and taxes, the destruction of countries, the way people unwittingly regurgitate everything they hear, read and see on TV, radio and in newspapers. The chains are financial, the cage is mental!



Upon each election, the persuadable voters in their naivety, tend vote out the previously elected politician, relying on the next greatly pushed puppet to be a better and more trustworthy choice. And even though this repeats itself every election, mostly they remain unaware of this ongoing pattern. Some voters do realise that all politicians are as bad as each other, though they still vote because they are under the impression that their vote counts for something, because the vote represents freedom.


Every time a politician has served his/her purpose, a new party and politician is pushed - through advertising, or 'lying' as it is otherwise known! Every party has a slightly different angle, in destruction that is, one might be particularly bad destruction-wise working slightly faster towards our demise, and another may seem to take take take - then give a little bit back - if you get my meaning. They have different appearances, different ways of handling the position - which is all in the keeping of choices and freedom - the act has to be convincing. And that is all it is, an act! Every face in the eye of the public these days is an actor/actress - they put on a show, even when pretending to be themselves. Everything is scripted, every move planned. This is all part of corrupting your personality/choices - they're shaping who you are and what you think. The idea is to create a set group for each 'set' personality type so that these groups (which are somewhere further up police controlled) can be controlled, these people can be influenced and controlled. Such control allows our Zionist rulers to sway our actions, our decisions... which leads to us further reacting in the way they want and destroying the freedom we once had. Do not fall for the group stereotype ideology. Think for yourself. Be an individual, not a sheep!

Tuesday, 29 November 2011

Scientific breakthrough?



Faeces burgers? Seriously?
It never ceases to amaze me exactly how far scientists will go, in the attempt to play God.  Although, perhaps in this case, the more appropriate title would be: 'God of the bog'.  


Mitsuyuki Ikeda, the Japanese scientist behind such lunacy, claims that the burger - made from human excrement, steak flavouring, soy sauce and food colouring - tastes just like beef.  This sickening product, is supposedly set out to be the next big vegetarian meat alternative.  I ask, who would actually want to eat human waste?

Mitsuyuki Ikeda, believes his product will become popular with people wishing to lose/keep their weight down.  Is anyone actually that foolish/desperate?  Sadly, yes!

The human waste is high in protein matter.  This protein matter is extracted from the poo and basically tampered with (adding god knows what chemicals and such) until it can be made to resemble a meat product.  But why not save yourself some pennies?  Mould your own leavings in to a burger.  As the bought in alternative is set to be expensive.  Doesn't this veggie burger sound appetising?!

Will the FDA approve this?  More than likely.  The FDA's approval of anything is highly questionable.  For more info on this sick subject please visit this link: http://www.naturalnews.com/032715_turd_steaks_human_waste.html

Saturday, 26 November 2011

2012 Olympics: The future attack on London and Big Ben:


In 2012 the completely broke and in recession country England is hosting the Olympics in London.  Aside from this being a plot to further pull on the financial chains that bind the English, many theorists also believe this to be a deliberate set up for an inside job fake terrorist attack on London, specifically Big Ben, perhaps parliament and the actual Olympics.  Many things point to this being a strong possibility.  For example, the film V for Vendetta shows Big Ben being blown up.  The second Cars film poster shows a plane flying towards Big Ben.  Remember how 9/11 was exposed in cartoons, films and CD imagery before it happened?!  This is the exact same thing.

In 2000, the Rug Rats movie showed a plane flying towards the twin towers.  The plane was heading for France, so the twin towers in the scene makes no sense.  Unless it was for that purpose.
On September 21, 1997 the Simpson's aired the episode the city of New York VS Homer Simpson - in which 9/11 is also predicted.  And the Pentagon is also mentioned on the train by the homeless crazy man who refers to himself as Jesus.  Here is the Simpson's clip:  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FBp6OPlrl1g&feature=related

Michael Jackson predicted 9/11 on his album cover blood on the dance floor, released four years before 9/11.   The film Terminator 2 1991 also predicts 9/11.  During the film when the vehicle is approaching a tunnel separated with wall in the middle - it says on the bridge 'caution 9 - 11.
Super Marios Bros 1993 - shows the Twin towers ablaze and beginning to collapse.
Godzilla 1998 - mentions the WTC bombing.  And when a man looks at his watch the time is set to 8:55 in other words, 9/11 is depicted by the hands.
Trading places 1983 shows the twin towers - and a clock with the time 8:55 - with 9/11 being depicted by the hands again.
These are just some of the examples.  It isn't the first time a planned tragic event has been portrayed in the entertainment industry.  And this is why I believe the predictions for the Olympics to be accurate.


In 1995, Steve Jackson games released an Illuminati card game - many of the disaster cards have already happened.  And here is the one for the Olympics:

Big Ben is shown as collapsing on the people.  And the people in the foreground of the image are wearing the colours of the Olympics.  

Let us view some of the other disasters predicted in this fascinating card game that seems to have almost vanished, coincidentally of course.


9/11 - The twin towers and the pentagon attacks are shown here.


Kill for peace.  The American war against Iraq, Libya and Afghanistan were supposedly for peace and freedom.


America and England are police states. 


History has been rewritten many times.  To cover up the truth so that the Zionist Jews can prevail.  From the Jewish slave trade, to Hitler and the 6 million Jewish death toll lie, history has been rewritten.


The gulf oil spill that is currently destroying the sea.  Which nobody has been prosecuted for.  This is destroying livelihoods and killing anything that needs the sea to survive.  And the people responsible have been given new drilling licenses.  It has all been covered up, as if it never happened.


Here is one that is happening now.  America and England armies are being sent to provoke strong countries with attacks.  This will cause world war three.  America is on the verge or is already attacking Russia, a country that will retaliate.  Many lives will be lost - and all because of the media and establishment lies to justify war.


This is what their overall goal is.  To greatly reudce the population.  They will leave a few alive to keep as slaves.  But not enough to be a risk to them.


Japan is now radioactive due to the Israeli Stuxnet virus which knocked out the security systems - which should have prevented a melt down. 


In 2004, the Tsunami disaster killed many.  Indonesia suffered the greatest, followed by Sri Lanka, India and Thailand.  Do not forget that the US/establishment/Zionists have technology that controls and manipulates the weather.


Necrotizing fasciitis - is a flesh eating virus.  As is Ebola.  The Ebola one is man made, it may have been invented by the CIA or even the British.



Now that you have an idea of the predictions, hopefully you will be willing to further research these things for yourself.



On the 21st of May, 2011, the Daily Mail wrote an article stating that Al Qaeda were threatening to avenge the death of Osama Bin Laden (former CIA agent).  The reason for this is to convince us that terrorists are plotting against us, just like 9/11 and 7/7 - except just like the future attacks on London, Big Ben and the Olympics, 9/11 and 7/7 were inside jobs.  For proof that the official 9/11 story is not completely true, please view my video 9/11 truth which is posted on this blog in another article.  Also my article entitled BBC 9/11 lies.

As you saw in the image of the combined attacks card, Big Ben is a future target.  And what better a time to attack than the 2012 Olympics in front of so many witnesses - that will become so afraid of terrorism - that they will not question the official story.  And may even begin to wonder about 9/11 and 7/7.  Plus, what better way to kill off thousands of innocent people?!

Do yourself a favour, stay away from London in 2012.  Pass this information on.  And remember this warning come the dreadful future attack.

Friday, 25 November 2011

England is in recession, so let's spend £250000 on the Olympics:

 
Youtube has some interesting theories on why we are having the Olympics, here is one I viewed myself and I believe there to be some truth in it:  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qqwj4tIH2ds&feature=related

Also, so many public facilities are being taken away to cut costs for the Olympics.  We will not benefit at all from the Olympics.  But we will most definitely suffer from our facilities being taken away.  What are our taxes for exactly?!  Well, in reality they're to line the pockets of the greedy establishment.  And to pay for things we don't want, need or in any way benefit from.  Of course officially tax is to benefit the community and it is our duty to pay through the nose so that the government can wear their tailor made designer suits, dine at expensive restaurants and basically live the high life while we try to make ends meet.  Worrying where the next meal is coming from, and how to make a small amount of money cover bills and food costs.  Oh how the greedy establishment suffer for their people?!

Thursday, 24 November 2011

Crime doesn't pay... Or does it?!




From what we have rammed down our throats, starting from a very early age. One would believe, that the legal system, is there to help people who fall victims to evil criminals. Once upon a time, this was true. In the days when justice, was actually served. Today, the law protects the criminals from being justly punished, for their evil crimes. Most crimes don't even reach the news papers these days, unless they are racist crimes, (mostly, crimes commited by whites against other races), crimes against the government, some stronger or milder crimes reach the newspaper. But when it comes to other races persecuting whites, it is rarely even mentioned (mostly being displayed in a small paragrapth, somewhere barely noticeable). And so people are lead to believe, that racism AGAINST whites, never happens.  This of course, is deliberate. Because, it allows political correctness and the liberal agenda, to easily be enforced.

If the newspapers were to tell the truth about dealers, or drug related crimes etc, people would be outraged. Even more so if they knew that the criminals, are in no way punished. Instead, they're treated as victims themselves. With no consideration, for the actual victims of these criminals. England is a highly developed police state. With CCTV monitoring pretty much everywhere (these days). A network of paid informers, provide a constant flow of information. In addition to CCTV in towns, all the major roads networks are covered by CCTV, with number plate recognition technology. There are also military listening posts, which monitor every text message, email, telephone conversation and Internet activity, in which originates, or ends in this country. With this mass of information, the police are aware of every business transaction committed by criminals, such as drug dealers, people traffickers, paedophiles and pimps.  Why then, is there such a slow (if any) response to these crimes?

The opium fields were taken control of by the state. When America and Britain invaded Afghanistan in 2002, these fields had previously been burnt down by the Taliban. But since the troops moved in on this area, the crops have been regrown. Surprise, surprise, the heroin market has never been more busy, or free flowing. And since this is an Asian drug found only in Afghanistan, it is quite obvious that only Asians and the military, would have access to these drugs. Thus narrowing the heroin drug dealers down slightly. But if the troops control these fields shouldn't it be rather difficult to smuggle this drug? Strangely it seems not. Of course the only conclusion that can be drawn from this, is that the state are the true drug dealers. Using the foolish Asian dealers to smuggle. And selling it to the even more foolish addicts for a profit. But why would the state want to allow such an evil, dirty, drug to be so obtainable? Perhaps because, "Heroin leaves the person taking it in a state - where they are blissfully unaware of anything that matters. Unable to think rationally. Unattached from any real human emotions. It makes the addict feel safe. Like they are surrounded by cotton wool. Nothing can touch them."  As it leaves the addict experiencing no feelings of emotion, they are more likely to be dangerous to those they steal from, in order to get their next fix.  This drug leaves them with no common decency. Which means, when most of them steal to pay for their drugs, they will be fine with mugging, burgling, shoplifting, shamelessly victimising innocent people. They will heartlessly steal from young children, even if it is as little as £1. They will break in to your house, if you are unfortunate enough to be home, they will attack you, then rob you. Some heroin addicts, pay for their habit by selling their bodies to the dealers. As well as the dealers friends. Some, even build up a network of customers outside the drug circle. Grievously, it is not unusual, for some of these girls selling their bodies, to not even have reached double figures in age.

Heroin, keeps people from being a threat to the system. It keeps addicts from thinking about anything, except naturally, their next hit. Much the same as alcohol, keeps those sticking to the law from thinking much at all. It lowers the brain activity. Thus closing the mind off. Leaving the drinker in a state where they can barely think at all. It is not good for the body in any way. In fact, it is more dangerous than natural hallucinogenics. (Which taken properly, can be very beneficial both mentally and physically). Yet it is still legal to drink very dangerous alcohol. While, natural hallucinogenics such as, mushrooms, or cannabis are illegal. Even though they are good for you when used correctly. And open up the mind to new experiences and knowledge. Cannibis, has already proved to have healing benefits for patients of severe illnesses, or injuries.

Criminals, tested and found guilty of having heroin in their system, are given drugs orders on probation. Instead of going to prison, they have to go on a methadone prescription. These criminals are given drug tests, ranging between twice weekly, or once fortnightly. Everything that the addicts need (provided they have committed a crime), is payed for. Including housing, bills, food, drugs, clothes, shopping, furniture, electrical goods, days out, education, TVs etc. On top of all this, they still receive incapcity benefit/jobseekers allowance/income support. They are of course, free to do whatever they want.

Human rights exist not to help those who have had theirs violated. But to protect those who have violated the rights of others. When a drug addict commits a crime, they do not get punished... Unless it is a crime against the state - such as contempt in court. For example telling a judge that he is an out of touch moron. Which in most cases is the truth. Some of the sickest crimes to be committed these days, still receive no punishment. Evil crimes such as - paedophilia, rape, mugging, murder, assault and burglaries. These criminals are left free, to commit such crimes again. In many cases, these criminals are even moved in to areas with normal, law abiding citizens. Leaving innocent people to suffer from such crimes. Yet, I would imagine areas where the rich and powerful (such as the government) live you will find none! The rich live in walled communities. Which have CCTV surveillance, security guards, not to mention plenty of other expensive measures. (at the tax payers expense - of course), Which insures only the ever protected rich and powerful, have access to these properties.
And liberal morons ensure that criminals are spread across the country. Ruining the lives of the hard working decent English. This clearly excludes their own people, which are very carefully guarded.

People who make the law, protect people who break the law. Those who pay for the crimes of the state and the scum they create, are the ordinary people. Who get daily screwed by the rubbish in charge of the country. As well as the rubbish who would be in gaol, if there was any sanity in this country.
(By the way, for people who don't understand what the word gaol means, that is the English spelling of the word which Americans would call a penitentiary - or jail).

Wednesday, 23 November 2011

BBC 9/11 lies:

The BBC has always been a means of enforcing establishment propaganda, however they far exceeded their usual stupidity on the

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-14665953 
Gives the impression that conspiracy theories are totally paranoid and unfounded.  Making the whole idea of questioning any official story seem an act of insanity.  As well as unpatriotic.  But in reality to question things is normal.  To accept without question is the true act of insanity.  Questioning leads to answers and truth.  Mindlessly believing everything the media tells us is not normal behaviour.  But we have been conditioned to never think or question anything by the indoctrinating education system.  And anyone who believes it wrong to question and research such things as 9/11, if a complete and utter moron.

The BBC post questions regarding 9/11 inconsistencies, then the conspiracy perspective, followed by the propaganda of lie of coincidences.

Here is what the BBC say:


*The question: Why did the world's most powerful air force fail to intercept any of the four hijacked planes?
*Conspiracy theorists say: The then US Vice President Dick Cheney ordered the military to stand down and not to intercept the planes.
 
*Official reports say: This was a highly unusual multiple hijacking with violence on board, and where the transponder, which identifies the plane, was turned off or changed.
What is more, a routine military training exercise happened to be taking place that day at US air defence command.
Air traffic controller Colin Scoggins was in constant contact with the military and did not see any lack of response. There was confusion and a lack of communication between the civilian air traffic control (FAA) and the military.
The military's equipment was also outdated and designed to look out over the ocean to deal with a Cold War threat.

 As you can see the very first response to the question is a coincidental training exercise.  Which was actually deliberately taking place so that the planes could not be intercepted when they were being flown in to buildings.  The planes were flown with military precision, by remote control in to the buildings.  For alleged hijackers to control the flight path towards, and in to a building so easily, is completely illogical.

*The question: Why did the Twin Towers collapse so quickly, within their own footprint, after fires on a few floors that lasted only for an hour or two?
*Conspiracy theorists say: The Twin Towers were destroyed by controlled demolitions. Theories relate to the rapid collapse (about 10 seconds), the relatively short-lived fires (56 minutes in World Trade Center 2 or 102 minutes in World Trade Center 1), reports of the sounds of explosions shortly before the collapse, and the violent ejections that could be seen at some windows many floors below the collapse.

*Official reports say: An extensive inquiry by the National Institute of Standards and Technology concluded that the planes severed and damaged support columns and dislodged fire-proofing.

Around 10,000 gallons of jet fuel were spewed over many floors starting widespread fires. Temperatures of up to 1,000C caused the floors to sag and the perimeter columns to bend, causing the sounds of "explosions".

The massive weight of the floors dropped, creating a dynamic load far in excess of what the columns were designed for. Debris was forced out of the windows as the floors above collapsed.

Controlled demolition is nearly always carried out from the bottom floors up, yet this collapse started at the top.

No evidence has ever been found of explosive charges despite the extensive hand searches and there is no evidence of any pre-cutting of columns or walls, which is routinely carried out in a controlled demolition.

 Explosions were heard in the basement - which was blasted out before the collapse to make way for the controlled demolition.
The damage from the planes was not severe enough to cause a complete collapse.  Had there not been explosives, a few floors surrounding the hit may or may not have collapsed on to lower floors.  But the building would have remained standing.
Images show a woman standing at the edge of the building where the plane hit - had the damage been severe enough to cause several floors to collapse she would not have been able to stand there and look over the edge.  Plus, had the fires been so hot and fierce she would not have stood there - she would either be burning alive or making her escape from the flames.  This suggests the fire was dying out.
In regards to the jet fuel spillage - there is no way 10,000 gallons were spewed over many floors.  Most of the jet fuel was consumed in the fireball that resulted from the initial impact.  About two thirds of the jet fuel was burnt up in about ten minutes.  The fireball burnt outside of the building.
The steel frame needed a much hotter temperature than the fires from the plane hit to buckle or melt.  (As molten steel was found in the debris upto six weeks after the event - which is the result of thermite explosives).
Much of the debris was removed amd destroyed before a full investigation could even start.

*The question: How could an amateur pilot fly a commercial plane in a complicated manoeuvre and crash it into the headquarters of the world's most powerful military, 78 minutes after the first report of a possible hijack and leave no trace?
*Conspiracy theorists say: A commercial Boeing 757 did not hit the building but instead a missile, a small aircraft or an unmanned drone was used. But since evidence has increasingly shown that the American Airlines Flight 77 did hit the building, the emphasis has shifted to questioning the difficult approach manoeuvre. It is argued it was not under the control of al-Qaeda but the Pentagon itself.

*Official reports say: Airplane wreckage, including the black boxes, were recovered from the scene and they were catalogued by the FBI.

Although some early video did not show much wreckage, there is a good deal of video and still photography which shows plane wreckage and evidence of the flight path, such as broken lamp posts.

The remains of crew and passengers on the plane were found and positively identified by DNA. Witnesses also saw the plane strike the Pentagon. 

 Very little plane wreckage was recovered at all.  The hijacker supposedly flew round in a circle to hit the pentagon from the other side - which wasn't designed to withstand it.  And flew downwards towards the pentagon - pulling upwards to make a direct hit - making a tiny hole, but leaving no trace of the more indestructible parts of the plane such as the engines.  Pilots for 9/11 truth have even stated that such a difficult manoeuvre, for an amateur pilot, capable of flying only very small planes, is impossible.  Even for a skilled pilot it would be extremely difficult.  The pentagon was hit by something much smaller - that was also remote controlled.  And the FAKE debris was planted afterwards.  The supporting collumns of the pentagon where the plane supposedly hit and vanished in to thin air - were undamaged.  Windows surrounding the hole were still intact.  Had the official story been true the collumns would be damaged or knocked out of place and the windows would have been smashed by the plane nose, tail and initial impact.

*The question: Why was the crash site at Shanksville, Pennsylvania, so small and why was the aircraft debris not visible?
*Conspiracy theorists argue: United Airlines flight 93 was shot down by a missile and disintegrated in mid air, scattering the wreckage over a large area.
 
*Official reports say: There are clear photographs showing aircraft wreckage and the cockpit voice recorder, which showed there had been a passenger revolt and the hijackers had deliberately crashed the plane.

Initial theories that heavy debris was scattered many miles from the main crash site turned out to be false. In fact the wind had blown light debris such as paper and insulation just over a mile.

Another theory was based on a misquote from the local coroner, Wally Miller, who said he stopped being a coroner after about 20 minutes because there were no bodies. What he also said was that he quickly realised it was a plane crash and there would have to be a large funeral service for the many victims.

In addition, the military never gave orders to the air force to shoot the commercial airliner down. 

 The official story claims that there was a passanger revolt and the proof of this is on the salavaged flight recorder, however that information was never made public.  And the wreckage on the ground in no matched what would be expected, if the plane had indeed crashed.  This particular flight has more questions than answers.  

*The question: How could a skyscraper, which was not hit by a plane, collapse so quickly and symmetrically, when no other steel-framed skyscraper has collapsed because of fire?
*Conspiracy theorists say: The World Trade Center Building 7 was destroyed by a controlled demolition using both explosives and incendiaries.

Initially the focus was on the phrase "pull it" used by the owner, Larry Silverstein, in a TV interview. But in fact he was talking about pulling firefighters back. (Demolition experts do not use the term "pull it" as slang for setting off explosives.)

Now the focus has shifted to the speed of the collapse which reached near free fall for 2.25 seconds. It is argued only explosives could make it collapse so quickly and symmetrically.

Some scientists, who are sceptical of the official account, have examined four dust samples from Ground Zero and claim to have found thermitic material which reacts violently when heated up. They claim tonnes of thermite and conventional explosives were rigged inside, not just WTC7, but also the Twin Towers.
*Official reports say: A three-year investigation by the National Institute of Standards and Technology concluded that the building collapsed because of uncontrolled fires, started by the collapse of the nearby North Tower, and which burnt for seven hours.

The mains water feeding the emergency sprinkler system was severed. No evidence has ever been found of explosive charges and there are no recordings of a series of very loud explosions that would have been expected with controlled demolition.

Furthermore, there is an alternative explanation for the "thermitic material" the sceptical scientists found in the dust - it is just a type of primer paint. It's calculated 1,200,000 tonnes of building materials were pulverised at the World Trade Center and most minerals are present in the dust (not necessarily in a large quantity). More extensive sampling of the dust has not found any evidence of thermite or explosives, says a report from the US Geological Survey and another from RJ Lee

WTC building 7 was barely damaged, and only suffered small isolated fires.  It collapsed in the style of a controlled demolition - just like the twin towers did.  
The sentence 'pull it' by Larry Silverstein - was directed towards the building itself and not as the BBC suggests the firemen - because one would never refer to men as 'it'.  If it had been a case of pulling the firemen out of the building he would have said it directly as in 'pull them out'.  Larry Silversteins interview can also be seen on my video 9/11 truth.  And you can see for yourself that he was referring to the building.
'Pull it' is a building term for controlled demolition.
Explosives were heard and blasts can be seen in the collapse footage for the twin towers - building seven fell in the exact same style and fell quickly, with no damage to the surrounding buildings.  

The BBC repeatedly claim that conspiracy theorists shift their argument, however what actually happens is questioning the official claim of such coincidences.  When one part of an argument is covered up by the BBC lies, conspiracy theorists question another inconsistency regarding the same issue.  It is known as 'debate'.  Not argument shifting as the media would have you believe.
The BBC carefully choose their words, making sure that their readers react a certain way, in this case the readers response is to believe conspiracy theories as far fetched, and theorists as unable to make and stick to a valid point.  The media often lead their viewers/readers to a set conclusion - and not many people see through it.
Do not listen to the official lies, think for yourself.  Do some research.  Always question the lies of the media.

Tuesday, 22 November 2011

Education, destroying the nation!


The education system is not only a valid tool in the destruction/ control of young minds, the expression "give me the child until he is seven, and I will give you the man" - springs to mind (I will further explain this later), but it is also a means of psychologically beating down young impressionable minds. This is apparent in the way that white youngsters are taught they are vermin, basically having any sense of self worth and esteem diminished. Whites undergo the training that we are unable to express pride in white culture, for this is offensive, racist and wrong - in the eyes of the liberal do gooder establishment. This psychological beating children take, leaves feelings of guilt, worthlessness and little promise of a good life or great achievements (since whites are told they are vermin).

The saying I mentioned in the first paragraph - "give me the child until he is seven, and I will give you the man", basically means that young children can be brainwashed, more easily than children over the age of seven, at a young age children are influenced by their surroundings and education. After age seven, children develop their own minds and cannot be controlled, this is why the idea is to get children while they are young - so that the thoughts and opinions can be shaped for them, this opinion is the politically correct, do gooder, whites are scum and should be punished opinion.


Children can go to nursery from as little as three months old, which is long before they have had any real bonding time with the parents, or had any chance to develop their own personality, instead of the one the establishment pushes on them. Once a child goes to nursery, parents begin to lose the child, not only by way of the strong bond parent and child should have, but also on the level in which children follow their parents example and form their own personality through doing so. Nurseries are just training stations, preparing your child for the complete brainwashing they shall experience in schools. While I agree that children should be allowed to have fun, enjoy childhood and play etc, this does not mean they have to be treated like idiots - children's minds work somewhat like sponges, soaking up everything this is how children learn. If you treat children like idiots, they behave as such. In nurseries children finger paint, play with sand and water, dress up, play with toys and have maybe one story book read to them a day, they also have TV time (of course) - this does not appeal to a child's intellect at all. Children need mental stimulation, their minds need challenging.


Learning, is often passed off as boring, too much like hard work and something which can never be fun - this idea is drummed in to the generations by the establishment, who separate fun from learning. Learning, is fun - I admit it is of a different kind of amusement, but still fun nonetheless. Schools aim to keep the two separated, by keeping lessons dull, too controlled and requiring little individuality, self thought or general freedom. Schools also have breaks in which children are free to play in between lessons, again separating the two from each other. The method in which children are taught, plays a major role in how children respond to, or take in that education - if the lesson bears no true stimulation for the child, the child will fail to fully take in or remember the information. If teachers were to appeal to children's playful and excitable nature, the children would better take in any lesson. This of course, is not what the establishment want, the idea is for us to merely regurgitate the information we are given, never fully examining any given subject from both opposing views as well as the supporting views. We are never allowed to question what is classed as the only truth, because we may form our own opinions from such free thinking, this would destroy any grip the Zionist elite have over us.


Going back to the point I made earlier regarding psychological beatings, this affects children on many levels - any foreigners who witness this, begin to form the opinion of being superior to the white race, which is not true, whites also begin to feel the same. Whites fail education, because the education system fails them. Being told you are vermin on a daily basis, does nothing to inspire self improvement, only having your potential recognised as well as encouraged can inspire self improvement and want for further education. Because of this white generations are becoming self loathing, uneducated, liberal do gooders or racist.


Since some races choose to take advantage of the liberal do gooder ideology, that any race except whites deserves better treatment, can never be questioned/ criticised, deserves more rights and should be considered superior to the white race - whites become angry at, or submissive to this way of life. Equal opportunity only exists for those who are either perverse, mentally unstable or a different race - so for those of us who are straight, white, or haven't had a sex change - we will be considered less important and basically last in line for help, employment, health care, benefits, housing and mental health care. The system defies everything which is normal, teaching those who are different to think they are much better than us, and teaching those who have been beaten in to a submissive lifestyle that we should be ashamed of being normal - and these submissive people impose their brainwashed ideology on to others.


England, is becoming a very angry country. Whites are feeling let down by the system, which favours race or perversions over straight whites. People can feel something isn't quite right. Sometimes this inspires people to look in to these issues further, other times it leads to joining groups which promise things they do not intend to deliver, such as rights for whites, immigration control etc. These political parties, have only one true agenda, to get people together, focusing on one small problem, so they can never see past this problem - for example: the BNP, which is considered a racist group for obvious reasons (although they are now allowing foreigners in the group), but the true nature of such a group is merely to keep people focused on the issue of race - not the issue of who is behind the foreigners having more rights than us, I will not deny that these races take advantage of this because they do, I also will not deny that they play the race card to get their way, because they do. But the true problem, lies with the establishment, which is set up create this division of opinions - this allows the establishment to gain control through tricking people in to thinking there is a way out, a better option to turn to. Yet all of these parties are controlled by the establishment, and designed only to keep the people down, to keep us from ever progressing towards freedom, equality and a better world of freedom and peace. Groups like the BNP, sit around in pubs (for most of their meetings) drinking beer, talking nonsensical clap trap about what should be happening and never actually take any action, which of course is the whole point, to never get anywhere - it gives people a sense of false hope, so that we are not actually out there taking action for ourselves, because we are relying on a leader to dictate what happens next.


People fall in to the trap, thinking that the BNP will save them because they have been so let down by the education system that they are unable to think critically. The school system teaches people that everything is simple, there is right and there is wrong, and that everything has to be taken at face value, children who have their brains crippled by the mis-education system are more easily manipulated in to thinking that democracy really exists in this country, and that Nick Griffin gives a toss about them. If we had an education system, rather than an indoctrination system, then the Zionist liars of the tory, labour, liberal and BNP, and boneheads of the NF and SWP would be seen for the charlatans they are. But people support these shysters, and believe they crap they are fed by the TV. Why? Because their minds have been destroyed in the schools they attended as young children!